Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36712353›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2022

Fluorescence lifetime image microscopy prediction with convolutional neural networks for cell detection and classification in tissues.

Justin A Smolen, Karen L Wooley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Identifying lipid particle sub-types in liveFrontiers in chemistry · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin A SmolenDepartments of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77842, USA.
Karen L WooleyDepartments of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering, and Materials Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77842, USA.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and other deep-learning models have proven to be transformative tools for the automated analysis of microscopy images, particularly in the domain of cellular and tissue imaging. These computer-vision models have primarily been applied with traditional microscopy imaging modalities (e.g. brightfield and fluorescence), likely due to the availability of large datasets in these regimes. However, more advanced microscopy imaging techniques could, potentially, allow for improved model performance in various computational histopathology tasks. In this work, we demonstrate that CNNs can achieve high accuracy in cell detection and classification without large amounts of data when applied to histology images acquired by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). This accuracy is higher than what would be achieved with regular single or dual-channel fluorescence images under the same settings, particularly for CNNs pretrained on publicly available fluorescent cell or general image datasets. Additionally, generated FLIM images could be predicted from just the fluorescence image data by using a dense U-Net CNN model trained on a subset of ground-truth FLIM images. These U-Net CNN generated FLIM images demonstrated high similarity to ground truth and improved accuracy in cell detection and classification over fluorescence alone when used as input to a variety of commonly used CNNs. This improved accuracy was maintained even when the FLIM images were generated by a U-Net CNN trained on only a few example FLIM images.

Indexed as

computational histologyconvolutional neural networksfluorescence lifetime imaging microscopymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36712353
PMCPMC9802238
OpenAlexW4306252647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.