ArticlePNAS nexus2022
Fluorescence lifetime image microscopy prediction with convolutional neural networks for cell detection and classification in tissues.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective transfer of tumor annotations from hematoxylin and eosin to fluorescence images of breast and lung tissues.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Probing organoid metabolism using fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM): The next frontier of drug discovery and disease understanding.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Identifying lipid particle sub-types in liveFrontiers in chemistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and other deep-learning models have proven to be transformative tools for the automated analysis of microscopy images, particularly in the domain of cellular and tissue imaging. These computer-vision models have primarily been applied with traditional microscopy imaging modalities (e.g. brightfield and fluorescence), likely due to the availability of large datasets in these regimes. However, more advanced microscopy imaging techniques could, potentially, allow for improved model performance in various computational histopathology tasks. In this work, we demonstrate that CNNs can achieve high accuracy in cell detection and classification without large amounts of data when applied to histology images acquired by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). This accuracy is higher than what would be achieved with regular single or dual-channel fluorescence images under the same settings, particularly for CNNs pretrained on publicly available fluorescent cell or general image datasets. Additionally, generated FLIM images could be predicted from just the fluorescence image data by using a dense U-Net CNN model trained on a subset of ground-truth FLIM images. These U-Net CNN generated FLIM images demonstrated high similarity to ground truth and improved accuracy in cell detection and classification over fluorescence alone when used as input to a variety of commonly used CNNs. This improved accuracy was maintained even when the FLIM images were generated by a U-Net CNN trained on only a few example FLIM images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.