ArticlePNAS nexus2022
Learning physics-consistent particle interactions.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-tailored machine learning reveals unexpected physics in dusty plasmas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Integrating physics and topology in neural networks for learning rigid body dynamics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Collective relational inference for learning heterogeneous interactions.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interacting particle systems play a key role in science and engineering. Access to the governing particle interaction law is fundamental for a complete understanding of such systems. However, the inherent system complexity keeps the particle interaction hidden in many cases. Machine learning methods have the potential to learn the behavior of interacting particle systems by combining experiments with data analysis methods. However, most existing algorithms focus on learning the kinetics at the particle level. Learning pairwise interaction, e.g., pairwise force or pairwise potential energy, remains an open challenge. Here, we propose an algorithm that adapts the Graph Networks framework, which contains an edge part to learn the pairwise interaction and a node part to model the dynamics at particle level. Different from existing approaches that use neural networks in both parts, we design a deterministic operator in the node part that allows to precisely infer the pairwise interactions that are consistent with underlying physical laws by only being trained to predict the particle acceleration. We test the proposed methodology on multiple datasets and demonstrate that it achieves superior performance in inferring correctly the pairwise interactions while also being consistent with the underlying physics on all the datasets. While the previously proposed approaches are able to be applied as simulators, they fail to infer physically consistent particle interactions that satisfy Newton's laws. Moreover, the proposed physics-induced graph network for particle interaction also outperforms the other baseline models in terms of generalization ability to larger systems and robustness to significant levels of noise. The developed methodology can support a better understanding and discovery of the underlying particle interaction laws, and hence, guide the design of materials with targeted properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.