Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36712158›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2022

Efficacy of digital health interventions on depression and anxiety in patients with cardiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Toshiki Kaihara, Martijn Scherrenberg, Valent Intan-Goey, Maarten Falter, Hanne Kindermans, Ines Frederix, Paul Dendale

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Digital Health Education for Chronic Lung Disease: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toshiki KaiharaDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0941-8035
Martijn ScherrenbergDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-3828
Valent Intan-GoeyFaculty of Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Maarten FalterDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Hanne KindermansUHasselt, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences/Human-Computer Interaction and eHealth, Diepenbeek, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-1645
Ines FrederixDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Paul DendaleDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0821-4559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Depression and anxiety have a detrimental effect on the health outcomes of patients with heart disease. Digital health interventions (DHIs) could offer a solution to treat depression and anxiety in patients with heart disease, but evidence of its efficacy remains scarce. This review summarizes the latest data about the impact of DHIs on depression/anxiety in patients with cardiac disease. Methods and results: Articles from 2000 to 2021 in English were searched through electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase). Articles were included if they incorporated a randomized controlled trial design for patients with cardiac disease and used DHIs in which depression or anxiety was set as outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. A total of 1675 articles were included and the screening identified a total of 17 articles. Results indicated that telemonitoring systems have a beneficial effect on depression [standardized mean difference for depression questionnaire score -0.78 ( Conclusion: Telemonitoring systems for heart failure and PC/cell phone-based psychosocial education and training for patients with heart failure or coronary heart disease had a beneficial effect especially on depression. Regarding telemonitoring for heart failure, this effect was reached even without incorporating a specific psychological intervention. These results illustrate the future potential of DHIs for mental health in cardiology.

Indexed as

AnxietyCardiac diseaseDepressionDigital cardiologyPreventive cardiologyTelemonitoringVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36712158
PMCPMC9707908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.