Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711966›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Sherjeel Arif, Rachel Madhogarhia, Nastaran Khalili, Debanjan Haldar, Sina Bagheri, Ariana M Familiar, Hannah Anderson, Shuvanjan Haldar, Wenxin Tu and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anahita Fathi KazerooniORCID 0000-0001-7131-2261
Sherjeel Arif
Rachel Madhogarhia
Nastaran Khalili
Debanjan Haldar
Sina Bagheri
Ariana M Familiar
Hannah Anderson
Shuvanjan Haldar
Wenxin Tu
Meen Chul Kim
Karthik Viswanathan
Sabine Muller
Michael Prados
Cassie Kline
Lorenna Vidal
Mariam Aboian
Phillip B Storm
Adam C Resnick
Jeffrey B Ware
Christos Davatzikos
Ali Nabavizadeh
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of the Sciences · USYale University · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001862 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors and the leading cause of cancer-related death among all childhood cancers. Tumor segmentation is essential in surgical and treatment planning, and response assessment and monitoring. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and has high interoperator variability. We present a multi-institutional deep learning-based method for automated brain extraction and segmentation of pediatric brain tumors based on multi-parametric MRI scans. Methods: Multi-parametric scans (T1w, T1w-CE, T2, and T2-FLAIR) of 244 pediatric patients (n=215 internal and n=29 external cohorts) with de novo brain tumors, including a variety of tumor subtypes, were preprocessed and manually segmented to identify the brain tissue and tumor subregions into four tumor subregions, i.e., enhancing tumor (ET), non-enhancing tumor (NET), cystic components (CC), and peritumoral edema (ED). The internal cohort was split into training (n=151), validation (n=43), and withheld internal test (n=21) subsets. DeepMedic, a three-dimensional convolutional neural network, was trained and the model parameters were tuned. Finally, the network was evaluated on the withheld internal and external test cohorts. Results: Dice similarity score (median±SD) was 0.91±0.10/0.88±0.16 for the whole tumor, 0.73±0.27/0.84±0.29 for ET, 0.79±19/0.74±0.27 for union of all non-enhancing components (i.e., NET, CC, ED), and 0.98±0.02 for brain tissue in both internal/external test sets. Conclusions: Our proposed automated brain extraction and tumor subregion segmentation models demonstrated accurate performance on segmentation of the brain tissue and whole tumor regions in pediatric brain tumors and can facilitate detection of abnormal regions for further clinical measurements. Key Points: We proposed automated tumor segmentation and brain extraction on pediatric MRI.The volumetric measurements using our models agree with ground truth segmentations. Importance of the Study: The current response assessment in pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) is currently based on bidirectional or 2D measurements, which underestimate the size of non-spherical and complex PBTs in children compared to volumetric or 3D methods. There is a need for development of automated methods to reduce manual burden and intra- and inter-rater variability to segment tumor subregions and assess volumetric changes. Most currently available automated segmentation tools are developed on adult brain tumors, and therefore, do not generalize well to PBTs that have different radiological appearances. To address this, we propose a deep learning (DL) auto-segmentation method that shows promising results in PBTs, collected from a publicly available large-scale imaging dataset (Children's Brain Tumor Network; CBTN) that comprises multi-parametric MRI scans of multiple PBT types acquired across multiple institutions on different scanners and protocols. As a complementary to tumor segmentation, we propose an automated DL model for brain tissue extraction.

Identifiers

PMID36711966
PMCPMC9882407
OpenAlexW4315628939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.