Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711933›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Comparison of wholemount dissection methods for neuronal subtype marker expression in the mouse myenteric plexus.

Julieta Gomez-Frittelli, Ryan Hamnett, Julia A Kaltschmidt

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julieta Gomez-FrittelliDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Ryan HamnettWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Julia A KaltschmidtWu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
Neurosciences Institute · US

Funding

Stanford Chem-H Chemistry/Biology Interface Predoctoral Training ProgramT32GM120007 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BERTOZZI, CAROLYN · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM120007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurately reporting the identity and representation of enteric nervous system (ENS) neuronal subtypes along the length of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is critical to advancing our understanding of ENS control of GI tract function. Reports of varying proportions of subtype marker expression have employed different dissection techniques to achieve wholemount muscularis preparations of myenteric plexus. In this study we asked whether differences in GI dissection methods could introduce variability into the quantification of marker expression. Methods: We compared three commonly used methods of ENS wholemount dissection: two flat-sheet preparations that differed in the order of microdissection and fixation as well as a rod-mounted peeling technique. We assessed marker expression using immunohistochemistry, genetic reporter lines, confocal microscopy, and automated image analysis. Key Results and Conclusions: We found no significant differences between the two flat-sheet preparation methods in the expression of calretinin, neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS), or somatostatin (SST) in ileum myenteric plexus. However, the rod-mounted peeling method resulted in decreased marker labeling for both calretinin and nNOS. This method also resulted in decreased transgenic reporter fluorescent protein (tdTomato) for substance P in ileum and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) in both ileum and distal colon. These results suggest that labeling among some markers, both native protein and transgenic fluorescent reporters, is decreased by the rod-mounted mechanical method of peeling, demonstrating a critical variability in wholemount muscularis dissection methods.

Indexed as

enteric nervous systemGastrointestinal dissection methodsmouseneuronal subtypes

Identifiers

PMID36711933
PMCPMC9882214
OpenAlexW4317549157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.