Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711858›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Risk factors affecting patients survival with colorectal cancer in Morocco : Survival Analysis using an Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.

Imad El Badisy, Zineb BenBrahim, Mohamed Khalis, Soukaina Elansari, Youssef ElHitmi, Fouad Abbas, Nawfal Mellas, Karima El Rhazi

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Imad El BadisyMohammed VI Center for Research & Innovation, Rabat, Morocco. Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, Morocco.
Zineb BenBrahimDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Hassan II, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.
Mohamed KhalisMohammed VI Center for Research & Innovation, Rabat, Morocco. Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, Morocco.
Soukaina ElansariDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Hassan II, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.
Youssef ElHitmiDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Hassan II, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.
Fouad AbbasDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine of Fez, Research Laboratory "Epidemiology and Research in Health Sciences", Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdillah University, Fez, Morocco.
Nawfal MellasDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital Hassan II, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez, Morocco.
Karima El RhaziDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine of Fez, Research Laboratory "Epidemiology and Research in Health Sciences", Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdillah University, Fez, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to assess the overall survival rates for colorectal patients in Morocco and to identify strong prognostic factors using a novel approach combining survival random forest and the Cox model. Covariate selection was performed using the variable importance based on permutation and partial dependence plots were displayed to explore in depth the relationship between the estimated partial effect of a given predictor and survival rates. The predictive performance was measured by two metrics, the Concordance Index (C-index) and the Brier Score (BS). Overall survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were, respectively, 87% (SE = 0.02; CI-95% = 0.84-0.91), 77% (SE = 0.02; CI-95% = 0.73-0.82) and 60% (SE = 0.03; CI-95% = 0.54-0.66). In the Cox model after adjustment for all covariates, sex, tumor differentiation had no significant effect on prognosis, but rather tumor site had a significant effect. The variable importance obtained from RSF strengthens that surgery, stage, insurance, residency, and age were the most important prognostic factors. The discriminative capacity of the Cox PH and RSF was, respectively, 0.771 and 0.798 for the C-index, while the accuracy of the Cox PH and RSF was, respectively, 0.257 and 0.207 for the Brier Score. This shows that RSF had both better discriminative capacity and predictive accuracy. Our results show that patients who are older than 70, living in rural areas, without health insurance, at a distant stage and who have not had surgery constitute a subgroup of patients with poor prognosis.

Indexed as

colorectal cancercox modeloverall survivalpartial dependance plotsprognostic factorsrandom survival forestvariable importance

Identifiers

PMID36711858
PMCPMC9882696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.