Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711582›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Comparison of cell response to chromatin and DNA damage.

Artyom Luzhin, Priyanka Rajan, Alfiya Safina, Katerina Leonova, Aimee Stablewski, Jianmin Wang, Mahadeb Pal, Omar Kantidze, Katerina Gurova

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Artyom LuzhinDepartment of Cellular Genomics, Institute of Gene Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 119334.
Priyanka RajanDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, USA, 14263.
Alfiya SafinaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, USA, 14263.
Katerina LeonovaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, USA, 14263.
Aimee StablewskiGene Targeting and Transgenic Shared Resource, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, USA, 14263.
Jianmin WangDepartment of Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, USA, 14263.
Mahadeb PalDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, USA, 14263.
Omar KantidzeQuantori LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA, 02142.
Katerina GurovaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Sts, Buffalo, NY, USA, 14263.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USInstitute of Gene Biology · RU

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI CANDACE S JOHNSON · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Modulation of cancer specific transcriptional factors with small moleculesR01CA197967 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GUROVA, KATERINA V · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-targeting drugs may damage DNA or chromatin. Many anti-cancer drugs damage both, making it difficult to understand their mechanisms of action. Using molecules causing DNA breaks without altering nucleosome structure (bleomycin) or destabilizing nucleosomes without damaging DNA (curaxin), we investigated the consequences of DNA or chromatin damage in normal and tumor cells. As expected, DNA damage caused p53-dependent growth arrest followed by senescence. Chromatin damage caused higher p53 accumulation than DNA damage; however, growth arrest was p53-independent and did not result in senescence. Chromatin damage activated the transcription of multiple genes, including classical p53 targets, in a p53-independent manner. Although these genes were not highly expressed in basal conditions, they had chromatin organization around the transcription start sites (TSS) characteristic of most highly expressed genes and the highest level of paused RNA polymerase. We hypothesized that nucleosomes around the TSS of these genes were the most sensitive to chromatin damage. Therefore, nucleosome loss upon curaxin treatment would enable transcription without the assistance of sequence-specific transcription factors. We confirmed this hypothesis by showing greater nucleosome loss around the TSS of these genes upon curaxin treatment and activation of a p53-specific reporter in p53-null cells by chromatin-damaging agents but not DNA-damaging agents.

Identifiers

PMID36711582
PMCPMC9882266
OpenAlexW4317373646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.