Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711501›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

A modified Michaelis-Menten equation estimates growth from birth to 3 years in healthy babies in the US.

William Walters, Catherine Ley, Trevor Hastie, Ruth Ley, Julie Parsonnet

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William WaltersMax Planck Institute for Developmental Biology.
Catherine LeyStanford University.ORCID 0000-0002-8424-7873
Trevor HastieStanford University.ORCID 0000-0002-0164-3142
Ruth LeyMax Plank Institute for Developmental Biology.
Julie ParsonnetStanford University, Stanford.ORCID 0000-0001-7342-5366

Funding

Childhood infection and prevention of obesityR01HD063142 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PARSONNET, JULIE · 2009 to 2013
$3.7M
Longitudinal investigations of the infant virome and its associations with obesityR01HD088837 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PARSONNET, JULIE · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD063142NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Standard pediatric growth curves cannot be used to impute missing height or weight measurements in individual children. The Michaelis-Menten equation, used for characterizing substrate-enzyme saturation curves, has been shown to model growth in many organisms including nonhuman vertebrates. We investigated this equation could be used to interpolate missing growth data in children in the first three years of life. Methods: We developed a modified Michaelis-Menten equation and compared expected to actual growth, first in a local birth cohort (N=97) then in a large, outpatient, pediatric sample (N=14,695). Results: The modified Michaelis-Menten equation showed excellent fit for both infant weight (median RMSE: boys: 0.22kg [IQR:0.19; 90%<0.43]; girls: 0.20kg [IQR:0.17; 90%<0.39]) and height (median RMSE: boys: 0.93cm [IQR:0.53; 90%<1.0]; girls: 0.91cm [IQR:0.50;90%<1.0]). Growth data were modeled accurately with as few as four values from routine well-baby visits in year 1 and seven values in years 1-3; birth weight or length was essential for best fit. Conclusions: A modified Michaelis-Menten equation accurately describes growth in healthy babies aged 0-36 months, allowing interpolation of missing weight and height values in individual longitudinal measurement series. The growth pattern in healthy babies in resource-rich environments mirrors an enzymatic saturation curve.

Indexed as

birth cohortgrowthheight estimationMichaelis-Menten equationweight estimation

Identifiers

PMID36711501
PMCPMC9882604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.