Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711470›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Content Analysis of YouTube Videos Related to E-cigarettes and COVID-19.

Juhan Lee, Dhiraj Murthy, Grace Kong

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Juhan LeeYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Dhiraj MurthyUniversity of Texas at Austin, School of Journalism and Media, Department of Sociology, Austin, TX, US.
Grace KongYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Modified Use of E-cigarettes and Marketing on YouTubeR01DA049878 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KONG, GRACE · 2020 to 2022
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-cigarettes are frequently promoted on social media and portrayed in ways that are attractive to youth. While COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected people's lives, less known is how the pandemic influenced e-cigarette-related marketing and information on social media. This study identifies how e-cigarettes are portrayed during the COVID-19 pandemic on YouTube, one of the most popular social media platforms.

methodsWe searched for combinations of search terms related to e-cigarettes (i.e., "electronic cigarette", "e-cigarette", "e-cig", "vape" and "vaping") and COVID-19 (i.e., "corona", "COVID", "lockdown" and "pandemic"). To be included in the analysis, the video must be: uploaded after February 1, 2020, in English, related to e-cigarettes and COVID-19 and less than 30 minutes in length. We assessed video themes related to e-cigarettes and COVID-19, uploader characteristics, and featured e-cigarette products.

resultsWe examined N=307 videos and found that N=220 (73.6%) were related to the health effects of e-cigarette use on COVID-19, followed by videos of how COVID-19 affects e-cigarette access/sales (N=40, 12.9%), and face mask-related videos (N=16, 5.1%) which included content regarding masks and e-cigarette use. Instructional videos on how to modify e-cigarettes to use with masks had the highest number of likes (Median=23; IQR=32) and comments (Median=10; IQR=7).

conclusionsThis study identified various e-cigarette contents on YouTube during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings support the need for continuous surveillance on novel vaping-related content in reaction to policies and events such as the global pandemic on social media is needed.

Identifiers

PMID36711470
PMCPMC9882443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.