Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711453›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

A new gene finding tool GeneMark-ETP significantly improves the accuracy of automatic annotation of large eukaryotic genomes.

Tomas Bruna, Alexandre Lomsadze, Mark Borodovsky

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomas BrunaSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Alexandre LomsadzeWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0491-1648
Mark BorodovskySchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

Funding

NIGMS Administrative Supplements to Support Undergraduate Summer ResearchR01GM128145 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BORODOVSKY, MARK · 2018 to 2021
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale genomic initiatives, such as the Earth BioGenome Project, require efficient methods for eukaryotic genome annotation. Here we present an automatic gene finder, GeneMark-ETP, integrating genomic-, transcriptomic- and protein-derived evidence that has been developed with a focus on large plant and animal genomes. GeneMark-ETP first identifies genomic loci where extrinsic data is sufficient for making gene predictions with 'high confidence'. The genes situated in the genomic space between the high confidence genes are predicted in the next stage. The set of high confidence genes serves as an initial training set for the statistical model. Further on, the model parameters are iteratively updated in the rounds of gene prediction and parameter re-estimation. Upon reaching convergence, GeneMark-ETP makes the final predictions and delivers the whole complement of predicted genes. GeneMark-ETP outperformed gene finders using a single type of extrinsic evidence. Comparisons with gene finders utilizing both transcript- and protein-derived extrinsic evidence, MAKER2, and TSEBRA, demonstrated that GeneMark-ETP delivered state-of-the-art gene prediction accuracy with the margin of outperforming existing approaches increasing in its applications to larger and more complex eukaryotic genomes.

Identifiers

PMID36711453
PMCPMC9882169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.