Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711392›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Evaluating the impact of community health worker certification in Massachusetts: Design, methods, and anticipated results of the Massachusetts community health worker workforce survey.

Victoria M Nielsen, W W Sanouri Ursprung, Glory Song, Gail Hirsch, Theresa Mason, Claire Santarelli, Erica Guimaraes, Erica Marshall, Caitlin G Allen, Pei-Pei Lei and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria M NielsenMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Office of Statistics and Evaluation, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Boston, MA, United States.
W W Sanouri UrsprungMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Office of Statistics and Evaluation, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Boston, MA, United States.
Glory SongMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Office of Statistics and Evaluation, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Boston, MA, United States.
Gail HirschMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Office of Community Health Workers, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Boston, MA, United States.
Theresa MasonMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Office of Community Health Workers, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Boston, MA, United States.
Claire SantarelliDivision of Health Protection and Promotion, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Boston, MA, United States.
Erica GuimaraesMass General Brigham, Boston, MA, United States.
Erica MarshallDivision of Community-Based Prevention and Care, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Community Health and Prevention, Boston, MA, United States.
Caitlin G AllenDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Pei-Pei LeiOffice of Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, United States.
Diane BrownOffice of Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, United States.
Bittie Behl-ChadhaOffice of Survey Research, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, United States.
Massachusetts Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USMass General Brigham · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Professional certification of community health workers (CHWs) is a debated topic. Although intended to promote CHWs, certification may have unintended impacts given the grassroots nature of the workforce. As such, both intended effects and unintended adverse effects should be carefully evaluated. However, there is a lack of published literature describing such effective evaluations with a robust methodology. In this methods paper, we describe a key component of evaluating CHW certification in Massachusetts-the Massachusetts CHW Workforce Survey. Methods: Design of the surveys was informed by a program theory framework that delineated both positive and negative potential impacts of Massachusetts CHW certification on CHWs and CHW employers. Using this framework, we developed measures of interest and preliminary CHW and CHW employer surveys. To validate and refine the surveys, we conducted cognitive interviews with CHWs and CHW employers. We then finalized survey tools with input from state and national stakeholders, CHWs, and CHW employers. Our sample consisted of three frames based on where CHWs are most likely to be employed in Massachusetts: acute care hospitals, community-based organizations, and ambulatory care health centers, primarily community health centers and federally qualified health centers. We then undertook extensive outreach efforts to determine whether each organization employed CHWs and to obtain CHW and CHW employer contact information. Our statistical analysis of the data utilized inverse probability score weighting accounting for organizational, site, and individual response. Anticipated results: Wave one of the survey was administered in 2016 prior to launch of Massachusetts CHW certification and wave two in 2021. We report descriptive statistics of the three sample frames and response rates of each survey for each wave. Further, we describe select anticipated results related to certification, including outcomes of the program theory framework. Conclusions: The Massachusetts CHW Workforce Survey is the culmination of 5 years of effort to evaluate the impact of CHW certification in Massachusetts. Our comprehensive description of our methodology addresses an important gap in CHW research literature. The rigorous design, administration, and analysis of our surveys ensure our findings are robust, valid, and replicable, which can be leveraged by others evaluating the CHW workforce.

Indexed as

CertificationCommunity Health WorkersHumansMassachusettsSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforcecertificationcommunity health workershealthcare reformmethodssurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36711392
PMCPMC9877511
OpenAlexW4315641049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.