Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711373›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Digital health literacy and subjective wellbeing in the context of COVID-19: A cross-sectional study among university students in Ecuador.

María F Rivadeneira, Carmen Salvador, Lorena Araujo, José D Caicedo-Gallardo, José Cóndor, Ana Lucía Torres-Castillo, María J Miranda-Velasco, Kevin Dadaczynski, Orkan Okan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

María F RivadeneiraFaculty of Medicine, Public Health Institute, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Carmen SalvadorFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Lorena AraujoGeneral Students Office, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
José D Caicedo-GallardoFaculty of Medicine, Public Health Institute, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
José CóndorFaculty of Medicine, Public Health Institute, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Ana Lucía Torres-CastilloFaculty of Medicine, Public Health Institute, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
María J Miranda-VelascoDepartment of Education Sciences, Faculty of Teacher Training, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Kevin DadaczynskiDepartment of Health Science, Fulda University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany.
Orkan OkanDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has generated an avalanche of information, which, if not properly addressed, generates uncertainty and limits healthy decision-making. On the other hand, the pandemic has exacerbated mental health problems among young people and adolescents, causing a worsening of their wellbeing. Previous studies have found that digital health literacy has a positive impact on people's attitudes toward the disease. This study aimed to analyze the association between digital health literacy on COVID-19 with subjective wellbeing in university students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was developed in 917 students from Ecuador. Subjective wellbeing was measured with the World Health Organization WellBeing Scale. Digital health literacy was assessed using the Spanish-translated version of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument adapted to the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Bivariate and multivariate linear regressions were performed. Results: Digital health literacy and subjective wellbeing proofed to be significantly higher among males and among students with higher social status. The association between digital health literacy and subjective wellbeing was significant; for each increase of one point in the digital health literacy scale, an average increase of 9.64 points could be observed on the subjective wellbeing scale (IC 95% 5.61 - 13.67, Conclusion: Improving digital health literacy in health would improve the subjective wellbeing of university students. It is suggested strengthen the digital health literacy through public and university policies that promote access, search skills and discernment of digital information. Socioeconomic and gender inequalities related to digital health literacy need to be further investigated.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health LiteracyAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesEcuadorHumansMalePandemicsStudentsUniversitiesCOVID-19cross-sectionaldigital health literacyuniversitywellbeing

Identifiers

PMID36711373
PMCPMC9874317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.