Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711358›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

A European arena for joint innovation in healthcare: The Platform for Innovation of Procurement and Procurement of Innovation (PiPPi).

Margaret R Andrews, Preston A Long, Martina Ahlberg, Fred Balvert, Rossana Alessandrello, Agnese Lazzari, Maarten M Timmermann, Mariet Nouri Janian, Minerva Rantaniska, Ann Spence and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Margaret R AndrewsInstitute of Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Preston A LongInstitute of Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martina AhlbergCenter for Innovation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fred BalvertErasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Rossana AlessandrelloInnovation Unit, Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain.
Agnese LazzariTransformation, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Maarten M TimmermannProcurement, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Mariet Nouri JanianCenter for Advanced Technology in Health and Wellbeing, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Minerva RantaniskaTeaching, Research and Development, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ann SpenceTransformation, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Peter SödermanCenter for Innovation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Victòria Valls-ComamalaVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Tanja StammInstitute of Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATErasmus MC · NLKarolinska University Hospital · SEKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBAgència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya · ESHelsinki University Hospital · FIIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By 2000 the European Union (EU) had recognized that its innovation capacity was underperforming in comparison to similar competitors and trading partners. Although the EU has made an effort to stimulate public research and development (R&D) through policy tools like Pre-Commercial Procurement (PCP) and Public Procurement of Innovation (PPI), starting with the 2000 Lisbon strategy and continuing through the 2021 updated Guidance on Innovation Procurement, there has remained a gap in knowledge of and use of these tools, in particular within healthcare. The past decades have seen an explosion in the number and use of digital technologies across the entire spectrum of healthcare. Demand-driven R&D has lagged here, while new digital health R&D has largely been driven by the supply side in a linear fashion, which can have disappointing results. PCP and PPI could have big impacts on the development and uptake of innovative health technology. The Platform for Innovation of Procurement and Procurement of Innovation (PiPPi) project was a Horizon 2020-funded project that ran from December 2018 to May 2022 with a consortium including seven of Europe's premier research hospitals and the Catalan Agency for Health Information. To promote PCP and PPI, PiPPi established a virtual Community of Practice (CoP) that brings together all stakeholder groups to share and innovate around unmet healthcare needs. This perspective presents a brief history of PCP and PPI in Europe with a focus on digital innovation in healthcare before introducing the PiPPi project and its value proposition.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareEuropeEuropean UnionCommunity of Practicedigital healthhealth innovationhealth policyinnovation procurementuniversity hospital

Identifiers

PMID36711358
PMCPMC9877621
OpenAlexW4315641277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.