Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711352›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Older adults' needs and requirements for a comprehensive exergame-based telerehabilitation system: A focus group study.

Julia Seinsche, Eling D de Bruin, Ilaria Carpinella, Maurizio Ferrarin, Sotiria Moza, Francesco Rizzo, Claudia Salatino, Eleftheria Giannouli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07074639 (S.M.A.R.T), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07074639 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

S.M.A.R.T: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of Personalized Cognitive-Motor Exergame Training in Frail Community-Dwelling Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorEleftheria GiannouliRan2025 to 2027Enrolled344ConditionsAging, FrailtyArmsPersonalized, home-based motor-cognitive exergame training, Otago Exercise Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia SeinscheDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Movement Control and Learning, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eling D de BruinDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Movement Control and Learning, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ilaria CarpinellaIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio FerrarinIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.
Sotiria MozaMateria Group, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Francesco RizzoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.
Claudia SalatinoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy.
Eleftheria GiannouliDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Movement Control and Learning, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · ITETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Applied Sciences St. Gallen · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Telerehabilitation in older adults using information and communication technologies (ICTs) provides therapy, which is potentially equally effective as traditional rehabilitation, yet more accessible. This study aimed to analyze the needs and requirements of older adults (OA) and healthcare-professionals (HP) toward ICTs and telerehabilitation in general as well as toward a specific novel exergame-based telerehabilitation system (COCARE system, Dividat). Materials and methods: The COCARE telerehabilitation system enables individual training based on exergames, as well as an assessment system and a digital centralized case management. Six focus groups with in total 34 participants were conducted. A mixed-methods approach was used comprising questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Results: Both OA and HP would engage to an exergame-based telerehabilitation program. Major motivating factors are the relevance of such a training for health and the entertainment component of exergames. Main requirements are simplification of the system, variety, a personalized training, a constantly available contact person, and comprehensive instructions for use. Besides, HP praised the system's motivational effect, but remained concerned about risk of falls and social isolation. Conclusion: ICTs for telerehabilitation are accepted by OA and HP but should be adapted hardware- and software-wise to address OA' age-stemming vulnerabilities (e.g., risk of falls) and low ICT literacy.

Indexed as

TelerehabilitationAgedCommunicationExergamingFocus GroupsHumansMotivationexergameinformation and communication technologiesmotor-cognitive trainingolder adultqualitative researchtelerehabilitationUser-Centered Design

Identifiers

PMID36711352
PMCPMC9875084
OpenAlexW4315649477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.