Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711331›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Community health worker insights on promoting research engagement with diverse populations.

Cynthia M Killough, Annemarie Madaras, Christina Phillips, Jennifer Hettema, Venice Ceballos, Jesus E Fuentes, Heidi Rishel Brakey, Katherine Wagner, Kimberly Page

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Latine Immigrant Perspectives on Trust of Clinical Research.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cynthia M KilloughClinical and Translational Science Center, UNM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Annemarie MadarasDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, UNM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Christina PhillipsDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, UNM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Jennifer HettemaLifeStance Health, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
Venice CeballosCommunity Health Worker Initiatives, UNM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Jesus E FuentesClinical and Translational Science Center, UNM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Heidi Rishel BrakeyClinical and Translational Science Center, UNM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Katherine WagnerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, UNM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Kimberly PageDepartment of General Internal Medicine, UNM Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.

Funding

UNM HSC Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001449 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J, PANDHI, NANCY · 2015 to 2024
$36.9M
Southwest Clinical Trials Node: Clinical Research and Practice to Address Substance Use in Diverse, Rural, and Underserved PopulationsUG1DA049468 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI MARIA ADELA GRANDO, Kimberly Page · 2019 to 2026
$12.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001449NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA049468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Representation of diverse populations in health research enhances our ability to understand the factors that impact health, generalize results, implement findings, and promote social justice. The primary objective of the study was to understand the unique perspectives of frontline community health workers (CHWs) to identify actionable barriers and facilitators that may impact representation of diverse groups in health research. Focus groups with CHWs were conducted followed by thematic analysis. Results revealed five main themes: barriers/risks to research participation, facilitation of research, CHW roles, recommendations, and transparency. A novel finding was that some CHWs see themselves as both facilitators and gatekeepers. As facilitators, CHWs ensure their patient populations receive resources and benefit from being involved in research; as gatekeepers CHWs feel that they protect patient populations from experiencing further trauma, especially when engaging in research. Recognizing that in many communities there is a high reliance and trust with CHWs, can promote genuine and informed participation at all stages of research.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersTrustFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansQualitative Researchbarriers to researchcommunity health worker (CHW)ethnic minoritesracial minoritiesunderrepresentationunderserved and unserved populations

Identifiers

PMID36711331
PMCPMC9874150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.