Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711157›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2023

Deep learning prediction of non-perfused volume without contrast agents during prostate ablation therapy.

Cameron Wright, Pietari Mäkelä, Alexandre Bigot, Mikael Anttinen, Peter J Boström, Roberto Blanco Sequeiros

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cameron WrightDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5416-8958
Pietari MäkeläDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6224-0075
Alexandre BigotProfound Medical Corp., Mississauga, Canada.
Mikael AnttinenDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9351-7177
Peter J BoströmDepartment of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3647-0015
Roberto Blanco SequeirosDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-9639
University of Turku · FIProfound Medical (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-perfused volume (NPV) is an important indicator of treatment success immediately after prostate ablation. However, visualization of the NPV first requires an injection of MRI contrast agents into the bloodstream, which has many downsides. Purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning model capable of predicting the NPV immediately after prostate ablation therapy without the need for MRI contrast agents. A modified 2D deep learning UNet model was developed to predict the post-treatment NPV. MRI imaging data from 95 patients who had previously undergone prostate ablation therapy for treatment of localized prostate cancer were used to train, validate, and test the model. Model inputs were T1/T2-weighted and thermometry MRI images, which were always acquired without any MRI contrast agents and prior to the final NPV image on treatment-day. Model output was the predicted NPV. Model accuracy was assessed using the Dice-Similarity Coefficient (DSC) by comparing the predicted to ground truth NPV. A radiologist also performed a qualitative assessment of NPV. Mean (std) DSC score for predicted NPV was 85% ± 8.1% compared to ground truth. Model performance was significantly better for slices with larger prostate radii (> 24 mm) and for whole-gland rather than partial ablation slices. The predicted NPV was indistinguishable from ground truth for 31% of images. Feasibility of predicting NPV using a UNet model without MRI contrast agents was clearly established. If developed further, this could improve patient treatment outcomes and could obviate the need for contrast agents altogether. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-022-00250-y.

Indexed as

Clinical trials-thermal ablationContrast-enhanced MRIControl systems engineeringDeep learningHigh intensity focused ultrasoundTreatment optimizationUNet model

Identifiers

PMID36711157
PMCPMC9873841
OpenAlexW4308518073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.