Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711131›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

On-device synaptic memory consolidation using Fowler-Nordheim quantum-tunneling.

Mustafizur Rahman, Subhankar Bose, Shantanu Chakrabartty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mustafizur RahmanDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Subhankar BoseDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Shantanu ChakrabarttyDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: For artificial synapses whose strengths are assumed to be bounded and can only be updated with finite precision, achieving optimal memory consolidation using primitives from classical physics leads to synaptic models that are too complex to be scaled Methods: A prototype FN-synapse array was fabricated in a standard silicon process and was used to verify the optimal memory consolidation characteristics and used for estimating the parameters of an FN-synapse analytical model. The analytical model was then used for large-scale memory consolidation and continual learning experiments. Results: We show that compared to other physical implementations of synapses for memory consolidation, the operation of the FN-synapse is near-optimal in terms of the synaptic lifetime and the consolidation properties. We also demonstrate that a network comprising FN-synapses outperforms a comparable elastic weight consolidation (EWC) network for some benchmark continual learning tasks. Discussions: With an energy footprint of femtojoules per synaptic update, we believe that the proposed FN-synapse provides an ultra-energy-efficient approach for implementing both synaptic memory consolidation and continual learning on a physical device.

Indexed as

continual learninghardware synapsememory consolidationneuromorphicquantum-tunneling

Identifiers

PMID36711131
PMCPMC9880265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.