ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022
Towards biomarker-based optimization of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease patients.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04658641 (Characterization of Complex Pulse Shapes in Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders Using EEG and Local Field Potential Recordings), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Characterization of Complex Pulse Shapes in Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders Using EEG and Local Field Potential Recordings
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical efficacy of neuromodulation in isolated dystonia: A systematic review of motor function improvement.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Parkinson's disease severity is encoded by non-linear oscillatory interactions across cortical-subcortical networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of evoked potentials for programming subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinsons disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- Are we ready for automated deep brain stimulation programming?Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025Review
- Mechanisms of DBS: from informational lesions to circuit modulation and implications in OCD.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Proceedings of the 12th annual deep brain stimulation think tank: cutting edge technology meets novel applications.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Validation of Lead-DBS β-Oscillation Localization with Directional Electrodes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- EEG-based biomarkers for optimizing deep brain stimulation contact configuration in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). To maximize therapeutic outcome, optimal DBS settings must be carefully selected for each patient. Unfortunately, this is not always achieved because of: (1) increased technological complexity of DBS devices, (2) time restraints, or lack of expertise, and (3) delayed therapeutic response of some symptoms. Biomarkers to accurately predict the most effective stimulation settings for each patient could streamline this process and improve DBS outcomes. Objective: To investigate the use of evoked potentials (EPs) to predict clinical outcomes in PD patients with DBS. Methods: In ten patients (12 hemispheres), a monopolar review was performed by systematically stimulating on each DBS contact and measuring the therapeutic window. Standard imaging data were collected. EEG-based EPs were then recorded in response to stimulation at 10 Hz for 50 s on each DBS-contact. Linear mixed models were used to assess how well both EPs and image-derived information predicted the clinical data. Results: Evoked potential peaks at 3 ms (P3) and at 10 ms (P10) were observed in nine and eleven hemispheres, respectively. Clinical data were well predicted using either P3 or P10. A separate model showed that the image-derived information also predicted clinical data with similar accuracy. Combining both EPs and image-derived information in one model yielded the highest predictive value. Conclusion: Evoked potentials can accurately predict clinical DBS responses. Combining EPs with imaging data further improves this prediction. Future refinement of this approach may streamline DBS programming, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04658641.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.