Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711115›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2023

Development and Validation of Short Forms of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (F-PCS-5) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (F-TSK-6) in Musculoskeletal Chronic Pain Patients.

Joane Le Carré, François Luthi, Cyrille Burrus, Michel Konzelmann, Philippe Vuistiner, Bertrand Léger, Charles Benaïm

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07680777 (Perioperative Rehabilitation for Individuals Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07680777 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Rehabilitation for Individuals Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled98ConditionsInguinal HerniaArmsRehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joane Le CarréDepartment of Medical Research, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.
François LuthiInstitute for Research in Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7440-1523
Cyrille BurrusInstitute for Research in Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-8085
Michel KonzelmannInstitute for Research in Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9842-7808
Philippe VuistinerDepartment of Medical Research, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2661-4970
Bertrand LégerDepartment of Medical Research, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2782-1442
Charles BenaïmDepartment of Medical Research, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8999-0674
Clinique Romande de Réadaptation · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic pain is a complex phenomenon. Understanding its multiple dimensions requires the use of a combination of several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, completing multiple PROMs is time-consuming and can be a burden for patients. The objective of our study was to simultaneously reduce the French versions of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) questionnaires to enable their use in an ambulatory and clinical settings. Patients and Methods: We conducted a clinical study between May 2014 and August 2020 in our rehabilitation center. 1428 chronic musculoskeletal pain patients (CMSP) were included. The originality of our approach is that the reduction method included qualitative as well as quantitative analyses. The study was divided into two parts: 1) reduction of the questionnaires (n=1363) based on internal consistency (item-to-total correlation), principal component analysis (item loadings), Rasch analysis (infit/outfit), floor and ceiling effect (quantitative analyses) and expert judgment of items (qualitative analysis), and 2) validation of the reduced questionnaires (n=65), including test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]), homogeneity (Cronbach α), criterion validity (Pearson correlation [r] with the long-version score), determination of the pathological cutoff and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). The two full-length questionnaires include 30 items in total. Results: The reduction resulted in a 5-item PCS (score 0-20) and 6-item TSK (score 0-24). Psychometric properties of the reduced questionnaires were all acceptable as compared with other version (α=0.89 and 0.71, ICC=0.75 and 0.60, r=0.86 and 0.70, MCID=2 and 2 for PCS and TSK, respectively) while keeping the structure and coherence of the long versions. Conclusion: The two reduced versions of the PCS and TSK can be used in CMSP patient. As their administration only requires a few minutes, they can be implemented in outpatient consultation as well as in clinical settings.

Indexed as

chronic musculoskeletal painCMSPPain Catastrophizing Scalepatient-reported outcomes measuresPCSPROMsTampa Scale for KinesiophobiaTSK

Identifiers

PMID36711115
PMCPMC9880014
OpenAlexW4318542550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.