ArticleJACS Au2023
Sequence Tendency for the Interaction between Low-Complexity Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Article in JACS Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Resolved Protein Energy Landscapes, Electrodynamics, and Fluidic Microcircuits as a Unified Framework for Predicting Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Link node: A method to characterize the chain topology of intrinsically disordered proteins.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
- Scale-free Spatio-temporal Correlations in Conformational Fluctuations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Molecular dynamics simulation on regulation of liquid-liquid phase separation of repetitive peptides.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Ensemble structure of the N-terminal domain (1-267) of FUS in a biomolecular condensate.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Crosstalk between protein post-translational modifications and phase separation.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
- "Boundary residues" between the folded RNA recognition motif and disordered RGG domains are critical for FUS-RNA binding.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reversible interaction between intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is considered as the driving force for liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), while the detailed description of such a transient interaction process still remains a challenge. And the mechanisms underlying the behavior of IDP interaction, for example, the possible relationship with its inherent conformational fluctuations and sequence features, remain elusive. Here, we use atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to investigate the reversible association of the LAF-1 RGG domain, the IDP with ultra-low LLPS concentration (0.06 mM). We find that the duration of the association between two RGG domains is highly heterogeneous, and the sustained associations essentially dominate the IDP interaction. More interestingly, such sustained associations are mediated by a finite region, that is, the C-terminal region 138-168 (denoted as a contact-prone region). We noticed that such sequence tendency is attributed to the extended conformation of the RGG domain during its inherent conformational fluctuations. Hence, our results suggest that there is a certain region in this low-complexity IDP which can essentially dominate their interaction and should be also important to the LLPS. And the inherent conformational fluctuations are actually essential for the emergence of such a hot region of IDP interaction. The importance of this hot region to LLPS is verified by experiment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.