Trial reportClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2023
Tolerance and Efficacy of a Dermocosmetic Containing Neurosensine
Trial report in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05540496 (Ocular, Periocular and Cutaneous Tolerance and Efficacy of Formula 2039002 10 Product in Patients With Palpebral Eczema During 4 Weeks Under Dermatological and Ophthalmological Controls), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ocular, Periocular and Cutaneous Tolerance and Efficacy of Formula 2039002 10 Product in Patients With Palpebral Eczema During 4 Weeks Under Dermatological and Ophthalmological Controls
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Eyelid eczema (EE) is frequently observed in patients with an allergic or atopic diathesis. As for atopic eczema, restoring the skin barrier of the periocular region together with relieving clinical signs and symptoms is important in the management of EE. This study assessed the benefit and tolerance of a dedicated dermocosmetic (DC) in subjects with EE. Materials and Methods: Open-label study in adults with EE and sensitive skin. The DC was applied twice daily for 28 days. Dermatological signs (eczema, desquamation/dryness, erythema, swelling, roughness) and symptoms (itching, prickling, heat/burning sensation, tightness) on the periorbital region, as well as ophthalmological evaluation were assessed at Day 0, 14 and 28. Subjects assessed quality of life (QOL) using DLQI, the perceived benefit and cosmetic acceptability of the DC. Results: Overall, 41 subjects were included; 59% were women. The mean age was 52.4±15.8 years; all subjects had periorbital sensitive skin. The DC immediately reduced the intensity of itching, prickling, heat/burning sensation and tightness. Clinical signs and symptoms had all significantly (p<0.001) improved by Day 14 and were sustained to Day 28. The DC significantly (p<0.001) improved the perception of irritation (73%) and swelling (66%) while soothing (59%) the periorbital skin regions at Day 28. QOL had improved at Day 28 (0.82±1.0) compared to Day 0 (4.17±2.23). No local adverse reactions were reported. Ophthalmological examinations paralleled the excellent dermatological tolerance of DC. Discussion: The tested DC is highly efficacious in reducing clinical signs and symptoms of eyelid eczema and was well tolerated. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier: NCT05540496.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.