Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36711062›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Radiomic Analysis to Predict Histopathologically Confirmed Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma Patients.

Anna Sophia McKenney, Emily Weg, Tejus A Bale, Aaron T Wild, Hyemin Um, Michael J Fox, Andrew Lin, Jonathan T Yang, Peter Yao, Maxwell L Birger and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anna Sophia McKenneyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Emily WegDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Tejus A BaleDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Aaron T WildDepartment Southeast Radiation Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Hyemin UmDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael J FoxDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Andrew LinDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jonathan T YangDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Peter YaoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Maxwell L BirgerDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Florent TixierDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Matthew SellittiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Nelson S MossDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Robert J YoungDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Harini VeeraraghavanDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Pseudoprogression mimicking recurrent glioblastoma remains a diagnostic challenge that may adversely confound or delay appropriate treatment or clinical trial enrollment. We sought to build a radiomic classifier to predict pseudoprogression in patients with primary isocitrate dehydrogenase wild type glioblastoma. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively examined a training cohort of 74 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild type glioblastomas with brain magnetic resonance imaging including dynamic contrast enhanced T1 perfusion before resection of an enhancing lesion indeterminate for recurrent tumor or pseudoprogression. A recursive feature elimination random forest classifier was built using nested cross-validation without and with O Results: A classifier constructed with cross-validation on the training cohort achieved an area under the receiver operating curve of 81% for predicting pseudoprogression. This was further improved to 89% with the addition of O Conclusions: Our results suggest that radiomic analysis of contrast T1-weighted images and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion images can assist the prompt diagnosis of pseudoprogression. Validation on external and independent data sets is necessary to verify these advanced analyses, which can be performed on routinely acquired clinical images and may help inform clinical treatment decisions.

Identifiers

PMID36711062
PMCPMC9873493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.