ReviewCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2023
Efficacy of hypertonic saline versus isotonic saline among children with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effectiveness of hyaluronic acid in reducing adverse effects associated with inhaled hypertonic saline therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2023Pooled it
- Comment on "Efficacy of hypertonic saline versus isotonic saline among children with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inhaled hypertonic saline (HS) reduces pulmonary exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged 6 or more years. However, the effectiveness of HS in improving clinical outcomes in younger children aged 6 or less years is not established. This study examines the efficacy of HS in younger CF patients. Methods: Searches were conducted across three databases (Medline, Cochrane Central and EMBASE) from inception through July 2022. Randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of HS in younger CF patients were included. Trials involving only patients greater than 6 years or control group other than isotonic saline (IS) were excluded. Outcomes measured included lung clearance index (LCI), cystic fibrosis questionnaire (CFQ-R) score, spirometry measures, oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, height and weight. Outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Seven studies ( Discussion: Treatment with HS in younger children with CF improves lung clearance, symptoms and quality of life. FEF Conclusion: The findings support HS as a therapeutic method in CF-affected children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.