Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36710976›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Use of fluorescence imaging to optimize location of tissue sampling in hard-to-heal wounds.

Thomas E Serena, Robert J Snyder, Philip G Bowler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Determination of the Course of Cyan Fluorescence ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Bacterial Fluorescence Signals Predict Dermal Regeneration Template Integration Outcomes.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas E SerenaSerenaGroup Research Foundation, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Robert J SnyderFoot and Ankle Institute, Barry University, Miami, FL, United States.
Philip G BowlerPhil Bowler Consulting, Warrington, England, United Kingdom.
Barry University · USSerenaGroup Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Wound microflora in hard-to-heal wounds is invariably complex and diverse. Determining the interfering organisms(s) is therefore challenging. Tissue sampling, particularly in large wounds, is subjective and, when performed, might involve swabbing or biopsy of several locations. Fluorescence (FL) imaging of bacterial loads is a rapid, non-invasive method to objectively locate microbial hotspots (loads >10 Methods: A Results: The comparison between the two biopsy sites revealed that clinical uncertainty was higher as wound surface area increased. The sensitivity of a FL-informed biopsy was 98.7% for accurately finding Conclusions & perspective: FL imaging provides a more accurate and relevant microbiological profile that guides optimal wound sampling compared to clinical judgment. This is particularly interesting in large, complex wounds, as evidenced in the wounds studied in this

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingWound InfectionBacteriaClinical Trials as TopicHumansOptical ImagingUncertaintyWound Healingantibiotic stewardshipbiopsydiagnostic stewardshipfluorescence imagingmicrobiological analysispoint-of-care diagnosticsampling techniquewound infection

Identifiers

PMID36710976
PMCPMC9878329
OpenAlexW4315796482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.