Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36710938›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2023

A comparison of pegged and keeled glenoid clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Akiro H Duey, Troy Li, Christopher A White, Akshar V Patel, Carl M Cirino, Bradford O Parsons, Evan L Flatow, Paul J Cagle

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akiro H DueyDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
Troy LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
Christopher A WhiteDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
Akshar V PatelDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
Carl M CirinoDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
Bradford O ParsonsDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
Evan L FlatowDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
Paul J CagleDepartment of Orthopedics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, 10029, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The two main glenoid types used in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) are the pegged and keeled glenoid designs. We aimed to determine if a pegged glenoid is superior to a keeled glenoid at long-term follow-up as measured by range of motion (ROM), patient reported outcomes (PROs), and radiographic glenoid loosening. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing TSA by a single surgeon at an urban, academic hospital. The cohort was stratified into two groups based on glenoid type - one group consisting of keeled implants and a second group consisting of pegged implants. For each patient, forward elevation (FE), internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, and simple shoulder test (SST) scores were collected preoperatively and at the most recent follow-up visit. Radiographic variables included acromiohumeral interval (AHI) and glenoid loosening. Results: After applying exclusion criteria, 144 TSAs were included in our study. Of these, 42 (29.2%) had keeled glenoids and 102 (70.8%) had pegged glenoids. Patients with a pegged glenoid implant were older (67.4 vs. 60.7 years; p < 0.001) and had a shorter follow-up time (9.3 vs. 14.4 years; p < 0.001) than patients with a keeled glenoid implant. At the most recent follow-up visit, there were no significant differences among postoperative FE, ER, AHI, or PROs. However, pegged glenoid implants provided significantly more internal rotation (T11 vs. L1; p = 0.010) and were less likely to show evidence of radiographic glenoid loosening (16.7% vs. 42.9%; p=<0.001). Revision rates were not significantly different between the pegged and keeled groups (6.9% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.158). Conclusion: Although a pegged design correlated with superior internal rotation and less radiographic glenoid loosening, both pegged and keeled glenoid designs offered favorable long-term clinical outcomes following TSA over the long-term.

Indexed as

GlenoidKeeledLooseningPeggedRange of motionShoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID36710938
PMCPMC9876778
OpenAlexW4317521141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.