ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2022
CRISPR genome editing using computational approaches: A survey.
Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-MBTF: a multi-branch transformer fusion framework for CRISPR-Cas9 off-target prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The emerging impact of CRISPR and gene editing on global crop improvement.Transgenic research · 2026Review
- Design of CRISPRi-Based Synthetic Gene Circuits in Bacteria.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Advancing CRISPR with deep learning: A comprehensive review of models and databases.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- CRISPR-GATE: a one-stop repository and guide to computational resources for genome editing experimentation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Review
- DTMP-prime: A deep transformer-based model for predicting prime editing efficiency and PegRNA activity.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2024Article
- Codon usage and expression-based features significantly improve prediction of CRISPR efficiency.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Review of applications of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in crop research.Journal of applied genetics · 2024Review
- Making gene editing accessible in resource limited environments: recommendations to guide a first-time user.Frontiers in genome editing · 2024Review
- Advances in Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Review
- gRNA-SeqRET: a universal tool for targeted and genome-scale gRNA design and sequence extraction for prokaryotes and eukaryotes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based gene editing has been widely used in various cell types and organisms. To make genome editing with Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats far more precise and practical, we must concentrate on the design of optimal gRNA and the selection of appropriate Cas enzymes. Numerous computational tools have been created in recent years to help researchers design the best gRNA for Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats researches. There are two approaches for designing an appropriate gRNA sequence (which targets our desired sites with high precision): experimental and predicting-based approaches. It is essential to reduce off-target sites when designing an optimal gRNA. Here we review both traditional and machine learning-based approaches for designing an appropriate gRNA sequence and predicting off-target sites. In this review, we summarize the key characteristics of all available tools (as far as possible) and compare them together. Machine learning-based tools and web servers are believed to become the most effective and reliable methods for predicting on-target and off-target activities of Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats in the future. However, these predictions are not so precise now and the performance of these algorithms -especially deep learning one's-depends on the amount of data used during training phase. So, as more features are discovered and incorporated into these models, predictions become more in line with experimental observations. We must concentrate on the creation of ideal gRNA and the choice of suitable Cas enzymes in order to make genome editing with Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats far more accurate and feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.