Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36710908›Full record

ArticleAdversity and resilience science2020

Inclusion of American Indians and Alaskan Natives in Large National Studies: Ethical Considerations and Implications for Biospecimen Collection in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study.

Ludmila N Bakhireva, Camille Nebeker, Pilar Ossorio, Jyoti Angal, Moriah E Thomason, Julie M Croff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Adversity and resilience science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ludmila N BakhirevaCollege of Pharmacy Substance Use Research and Education (SURE) Center, University of New Mexico, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC 09 5360, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9877-0211
Camille NebekerDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Pilar OssorioLaw School, University of Wisconsin, Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI, USA.
Jyoti AngalCenter for Pediatric and Community Research, Avera Research Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Moriah E ThomasonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Julie M CroffNational Center for Wellness and Recovery & Department of Rural Health, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Avera Health · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USMorgridge Institute for Research · USOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

The Healthy Brain and Child Development National Consortium Administrative CoreU24DA055325 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHRISTINA CHAMBERS, CHARLES Alexander NELSON · 2021 to 2026
$40.8M
4:4 Investigation of opioid exposure and neurodevelopment (iOPEN)R34DA050287 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BERGINK, VEERLE, THOMASON, MORIAH E · 2019 to 2021
$979k
4/6 Planning for the HEALthy Early Development StudyR34DA050341 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHAMBERS, CHRISTINA · 2019 to 2020
$917k
2/5 The Cumulative Risk of Substance Exposure and Early Life Adversity on Child Health Development and OutcomesR34DA050288 · NIDA · AVERA MCKENNAN · PI ELLIOTT, AMY J · 2019 to 2020
$697k
Understanding the effects of COVID-19 on maternal substance useR34DA050343 · NIDA · OSU CENTER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CROFF, JULIE MAY, MORRIS, AMANDA S · 2019 to 2020
$598k
6/6 Planning for the HEALthy Early Development StudyR34DA050237 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BAKHIREVA, LUDMILA NICOLE, LEEMAN, LAWRENCE M · 2019 to 2019
$542k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050237NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050287NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050288NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050341NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050343NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA055325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This manuscript is the result of an interdisciplinary team approach to examine the ethical and cultural considerations of biospecimen collection among American Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) communities for the planned Healthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study. We begin by reviewing a brief history of the treatment of AIAN communities by the US government and within research studies. Based in part on this history, we highlight the overlapping and intersecting vulnerabilities of AIAN communities, including historical trauma, poverty, lack of healthcare access, and environmental hazards. After consideration of ethical and legal implications, we introduce our recommendations for biospecimen collection/biobanking with AIAN communities in the context of population-representative, multi-site, national studies. We recommend the following key considerations: (1) authentic partnership development; (2) beneficence to the community; (3) culturally respectful research design; (4) meaningful consent to support enrollment and retention; (5) culturally appropriate data management. Adherence to a culturally aware approach for inclusion of underrepresented communities assures external validity in the national studies and increases likelihood of bidirectional value exchange.

Indexed as

American Indians and Alaskan NativesBiospecimenEthicsHBCD studyTribal communities

Identifiers

PMID36710908
PMCPMC9881679
OpenAlexW3094915480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.