Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36710872›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

A clustering method for small scRNA-seq data based on subspace and weighted distance.

Zilan Ning, Zhijun Dai, Hongyan Zhang, Yuan Chen, Zheming Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zilan NingHunan Engineering & Technology Research Centre for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-Making, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zhijun DaiHunan Engineering & Technology Research Centre for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-Making, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hongyan ZhangHunan Agricultural University, College of Information and Intelligence, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yuan ChenHunan Engineering & Technology Research Centre for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-Making, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zheming YuanHunan Engineering & Technology Research Centre for Agricultural Big Data Analysis & Decision-Making, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hunan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Identifying the cell types using unsupervised methods is essential for scRNA-seq research. However, conventional similarity measures introduce challenges to single-cell data clustering because of the high dimensional, high noise, and high dropout. Methods: We proposed a clustering method for small Results: We compared SSWD with seven prevailing methods on eight publicly scRNA-seq datasets. The experimental results show that the SSWD has better clustering accuracy and the partitioning ability of cell groups. SSWD can be downloaded at https://github.com/ningzilan/SSWD.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisCluster AnalysisSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisConsensus clusteringEP_disMarker genescRNA-seqSubspace

Identifiers

PMID36710872
PMCPMC9879162
OpenAlexW4317733031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.