Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36710720›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2023

Disease-modifying therapies for relapsing/active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis - a review of population-specific evidence from randomized clinical trials.

Antonios Bayas, Monika Christ, Simon Faissner, Juliane Klehmet, Refik Pul, Thomas Skripuletz, Sven G Meuth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Antonios BayasDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Monika ChristDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-1501
Simon FaissnerDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3412-762X
Juliane KlehmetDepartment of Neurology, Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Refik PulDepartment of Neurology and Center for Translational and Behavioral Neurosciences (C-TNBS), University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-9317
Thomas SkripuletzDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Sven G MeuthDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Düsseldorf 40225, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the understanding of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) is evolving, early detection of relapse-independent progression remains difficult. This is further complicated by superimposed relapses and compensatory mechanisms that allow for silent progression. The term relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) subsumes relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and SPMS with relapses. The latter is termed 'active' SPMS, for which disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved for either RMS or active SPMS can be used. However, the level of evidence supporting efficacy and safety in SPMS differs between drugs approved for RMS and SPMS. Our review aims to identify current evidence from published clinical trials and European public assessment reports from the marketing authorization procedure on the efficacy, especially on progression, of DMTs approved for RMS and SPMS. To identify relevant evidence, a literature search has been conducted and European public assessment reports of DMTs approved for RMS have been screened for unpublished data specific to SPMS. Only two clinical trials demonstrated a significant reduction in disability progression in SPMS study populations: the EXPAND study for siponimod, which included a typical SPMS population, and the European study for interferon (IFN)-beta 1b s.c., which included patients with very early and active SPMS. Both DMTs also achieved significant reductions in relapse rates. Ocrelizumab, cladribine, ofatumumab, and ponesimod are all approved for RMS - ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ponesimod based on an RMS study, cladribine based on an RRMS study. Data on efficacy in SPMS are only available from

Indexed as

disease modifying treatmentmultiple sclerosisrelapsing-remitting multiple sclerosisreviewsecondary progressive

Identifiers

PMID36710720
PMCPMC9880589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.