ArticleJournal of chest surgery2023
Surgery for Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: A Longitudinal Single-Institutional Experience.
Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute right heart failure revealing delayed traumatic right-sided diaphragmatic hernia: Case report and literature review.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Pleuroperitoneal Communication following Right Hepatectomy: Successful Treatment with a Combined Thoracoscopic and Laparoscopic Approach.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Commentary: Is the Data Strong Enough to Prorocolize the Approach in Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair? Aspects of Technique and the Sample Size of a Longitudinal Single-Center Study.Journal of chest surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study analyzed and described the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of diaphragmatic hernia (DH) repair according to the operative approach. Methods: After excluding cases with a combined approach and hiatal hernias, we analyzed 26 patients who underwent DH repair between 1994 and 2018. The baseline and perioperative characteristics of the thoracic approach group and the abdominal approach group were described and analyzed. Results: Fifteen of the 26 patients were treated through the thoracic approach, including 5 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Eleven patients underwent the abdominal approach. The thoracic approach was associated with a longer duration of DH than the abdominal approach (2 vs. 0.1 months), herniation of the right-sided abdominal organs, and herniation of the retroperitoneal organs. During the median follow-up of 23 months, there was no recurrence of DH. Conclusion: The surgical approach should be chosen considering the duration of DH and the location of herniated organs. VATS might be a safe and feasible option for repairing DH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.