Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36710419›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2023

Systematic analysis of the oncogenic role of FAM83D across cancers based on data mining.

Yan Geng, Jing Liu, Zichuan Wang, Tianzi Liu, Xintong Peng, Yan Huang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan GengSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Zichuan WangSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Tianzi LiuSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Xintong PengSchool of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.
Yan HuangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1599-9086
Weifang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family with sequence similarity of 83D (FAM83D) is overexpressed in various cancers. However, no pan-cancer analysis is presently available. In the present study, we used a bioinformatics analysis to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of FAM83D expression levels in human cancers. The GEPIA 2, TIMER 2.0, ENCORI, and DriverDBV3 databases were used to evaluate FAM83D expression levels. The potential prognostic value of FAM83D expression was analyzed using the GEPIA 2, UALCAN, and TISIB databases. The driver gene and promoter methylation levels regarding FAM83D were evaluated using the TIMER 2.0 and UALCAN databases. To further analyze interactive networks for FAM83D, FAM83D-binding proteins and related genes were determined using STRING and Gene MANIA analytic tools. Highly expressed FAM83D could be associated with mutated

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, HepatocellularCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsCell Cycle ProteinsData MiningHumansMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsFAM83D protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated Proteinsbioinformatics analysisbiomarkerdifferential expressionFAM83Dpan-cancerprognostic value

Identifiers

PMID36710419
PMCPMC10054166
OpenAlexW4318542448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.