Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36709555›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2023

GEEMAEE: A SAS macro for the analysis of correlated outcomes based on GEE and finite-sample adjustments with application to cluster randomized trials.

Ying Zhang, John S Preisser, Fan Li, Elizabeth L Turner, Mark Toles, Paul J Rathouz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Model-robust standardization in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ying ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, U.S.A. Electronic address: zying@live.unc.edu.
John S PreisserDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, U.S.A.
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, U.S.A; Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, U.S.A.
Elizabeth L TurnerDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, U.S.A.
Mark TolesSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, U.S.A.
Paul J RathouzDepartment of Population Health, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, U.S.A.

Funding

Transitional Care for Skilled Nursing Facility Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and their Caregivers: a Cluster Randomized Trial.R01NR017636 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LAURA C HANSON, Mark P Toles · 2018 to 2026
$4.1M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017636Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2019C1-16196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesGeneralized estimating equations (GEE) are used to analyze correlated outcomes in marginal regression models with population-averaged interpretations of exposure effects. Limitations of popular software for GEE include: (i) user choice is restricted to a small set of within-cluster pairwise correlation (intra-class correlation; ICC) structures; and (ii) inference on ICC parameters is usually not possible because the precision of their estimates is not quantified. This is important because ICC values inform the design of cluster randomized trials. Beyond the standard GEE implementation, use of paired estimating equations (Prentice 1988) provides: (i) flexible specification of models for pairwise correlations and (ii) standard errors for ICC estimates. However, most GEEs give biased estimates of standard errors and correlations when the number of clusters is small (roughly, ≤40). Consequently, there is a need for software to provide GEE analysis with finite-sample bias-corrections.

methodsThe SAS macro GEEMAEE implements paired estimating equations to simultaneously estimate parameters in marginal mean and ICC models. It provides bias-corrected standard errors and uses matrix-adjusted estimating equations (MAEE) for bias-corrected estimation of correlations. Several built-in correlation matrix options, rarely found in software, are offered for multi-period, cluster randomized trials and similarly structured longitudinal observational data structures. Additional options include user-specified correlation structures and deletion diagnostics, namely Cooks' Distance and DBETA statistics that estimate the influence of observations, cluster-periods (when applicable) and clusters.

resultsGEEMAEE is illustrated for a binary and a count outcome in two stepped wedge cluster randomized trials and a binary outcome in a longitudinal study of disease surveillance. Use of MAEE resulted in larger values of correlation estimates compared to uncorrected estimating equations. Use of bias-corrected variance estimators resulted in (appropriately) larger values of standard errors compared to the usual sandwich estimators. Deletion diagnostics identified the clusters and cluster-periods having the most influence.

conclusionsThe SAS macro GEEMAEE provides regression analysis for clustered or longitudinal responses, and is particularly useful when the number of clusters is small. Flexible specification and bias-corrected estimation of pairwise correlation parameters and standard errors are key features of the software to provide valid inference in real-world settings.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationLongitudinal StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicClustered outcomesFinite-sample biasIntra-cluster correlationsRegression diagnosticsStepped wedge trials

Identifiers

PMID36709555
PMCPMC10037297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.