Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36709404›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

The association of postoperative global femoral offset with total hip arthroplasty outcomes.

Yuki Hirano, Norio Imai, Asami Nozaki, Yoji Horigome, Hayato Suzuki, Hiroyuki Kawashima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk factors for residual pelvic obliquity one year after total hip arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuki HiranoDivision of Orthopedic Surgery Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757, Asahimachi-do-ri, Chuou ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Norio ImaiDivision of Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757, Asahimachi-do-ri, Chuou ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan. imainorio2001@yahoo.co.jp.
Asami NozakiDivision of Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757, Asahimachi-do-ri, Chuou ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Yoji HorigomeDivision of Orthopedic Surgery Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757, Asahimachi-do-ri, Chuou ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Hayato SuzukiDivision of Orthopedic Surgery Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757, Asahimachi-do-ri, Chuou ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Hiroyuki KawashimaDivision of Orthopedic Surgery Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757, Asahimachi-do-ri, Chuou ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global femoral offset (GFO) and femoral offset (FO) reportedly affect outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, FO assessed using plain radiography is affected by internal and external rotations of the hip joint. We investigated the relationship between leg length discrepancy and Harris hip score (HHS), and their influence on acetabular offset (AO), FO, GFO, anterior femoral offset, and outcomes after THA. We retrospectively evaluated 140 patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA. A three-dimensional (3D) pelvis and femur model created from computed tomography (data using ZedHip software was used to investigate these parameters. The modified (m)HHS scores were significantly improved from 49.0 to 88.8 in total mHHS, 20.0-44.5 in pain, and 28.9-44.4 points in function. Significant correlations were found between the differences in AO, FO, GFO, and pain score in binominal, with maximum values of - 1.24, + 1.54, and + 0.90 mm/100 cm body height, respectively. The maximum value of GFO and mHHS in binominal was + 1.17 mm/100 cm body height (BH). The optimal range of difference of GFO was - 1.75 to 4.09 mm/100 cm BH. This is the first report using a 3D method for assessing FO. Preoperative planning using the system could improve postoperative function.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, HipFemurHip JointHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36709404
PMCPMC9884219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.