Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36709308›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial.

Christopher J Weir, Imad Adamestam, Rona Sharp, Holly Ennis, Andrew Heed, Robin Williams, Kathrin Cresswell, Omara Dogar, Sarah Pontefract, Jamie Coleman and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Christopher J WeirEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Christopher.Weir@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-4903
Imad AdamestamEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-3682
Rona SharpUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Holly EnnisEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew HeedNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Robin WilliamsInstitute for the Study of Science, Technology and Innovation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9044-4611
Kathrin CresswellUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-9537
Omara DogarUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7122-8403
Sarah PontefractInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0344-4075
Jamie ColemanInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard LilfordUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0634-984X
Neil WatsonNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Ann SleeNHS England, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-7041
Antony ChuterUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-5939
Jillian BeggsUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-3256
Sarah SlightSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0339-846X
James MasonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9210-4082
Lucy YardleySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Aziz SheikhUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-3056

Funding

Programme Grants for Applied Research NIHR RP-PG-0617-20009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a leading global public health threat, with inappropriate use of antimicrobials in healthcare contributing to its development. Given this urgent need, we developed a complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship intervention (ePAMS+).

methodsePAMS+ includes educational and organisational behavioural elements, plus guideline-based clinical decision support to aid optimal antimicrobial use in hospital inpatients. ePAMS+ particularly focuses on prompt initiation of antimicrobials, followed by early review once test results are available to facilitate informed decision-making on stopping or switching where appropriate. A mixed-methods feasibility trial of ePAMS+ will take place in two NHS acute hospital care organisations. Qualitative staff interviews and observation of practice will respectively gather staff views on the technical component of ePAMS+ and information on their use of ePAMS+ in routine work. Focus groups will elicit staff and patient views on ePAMS+; one-to-one interviews will discuss antimicrobial stewardship with staff and will record patient experiences of receiving antibiotics and their thoughts on inappropriate prescribing. Qualitative data will be analysed thematically. Fidelity Index development will enable enactment of ePAMS+ to be measured objectively in a subsequent trial assessing the effectiveness of ePAMS+. Quantitative data collection will determine the feasibility of extracting data and deriving key summaries of antimicrobial prescribing; we will quantify variability in the primary outcome, number of antibiotic defined daily doses, to inform the future larger-scale trial design. DISCUSSION: This trial is essential to determine the feasibility of implementing the ePAMS+ intervention and measuring relevant outcomes, prior to evaluating its clinical and cost-effectiveness in a full scale hybrid cluster-randomised stepped-wedge clinical trial. Findings will be shared with study sites and with qualitative research participants and will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at academic conferences.

trial registrationThe qualitative and Fidelity Index research were approved by the Health and Research Authority and the North of Scotland Research Ethics Service (ref: 19/NS/0174). The feasibility trial and quantitative analysis (protocol v1.0, 15 December 2021) were approved by the London South East Research Ethics Committee (ref: 22/LO/0204) and registered with ISRCTN ( ISRCTN 13429325 ) on 24 March 2022.

Indexed as

BacteriologyDecision supportHealth informaticsInfectious diseasesMicrobiology

Identifiers

PMID36709308
PMCPMC9883604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.