ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023
DeepSelectNet: deep neural network based selective sequencing for oxford nanopore sequencing.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review: Long-Read Sequencing in Algal Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Genome-guided generative adversarial learning enables nanopore adaptive sequencing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Rawsamble: overlapping raw nanopore signals using a hash-based seeding mechanism.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Campolina: a deep neural framework for accurate segmentation of nanopore signals.Genome biology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive benchmarking of adaptive sampling tools for nanopore sequencing.Genome biology · 2025Article
- A new compression strategy to reduce the size of nanopore sequencing data.Genome research · 2025Article
- A generalized protein identification method for novel and diverse sequencing technologies.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- RawHash2: mapping raw nanopore signals using hash-based seeding and adaptive quantization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- ReadCurrent: a VDCNN-based tool for fast and accurate nanopore selective sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Simulation of nanopore sequencing signal data with tunable parameters.Genome research · 2024Article
- Article
- Streamlining remote nanopore data access with slow5curl.GigaScience · 2024Article
- NanoDeep: a deep learning framework for nanopore adaptive sampling on microbial sequencing.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- RawHash: enabling fast and accurate real-time analysis of raw nanopore signals for large genomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Accelerated nanopore basecalling with SLOW5 data format.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Unlocking the Power of Nanopores: Recent Advances in Biosensing Applications and Analog Front-End.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Flexible and efficient handling of nanopore sequencing signal data with slow5tools.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNanopore sequencing allows selective sequencing, the ability to programmatically reject unwanted reads in a sample. Selective sequencing has many present and future applications in genomics research and the classification of species from a pool of species is an example. Existing methods for selective sequencing for species classification are still immature and the accuracy highly varies depending on the datasets. For the five datasets we tested, the accuracy of existing methods varied in the range of [Formula: see text] 77 to 97% (average accuracy < 89%). Here we present DeepSelectNet, an accurate deep-learning-based method that can directly classify nanopore current signals belonging to a particular species. DeepSelectNet utilizes novel data preprocessing techniques and improved neural network architecture for regularization.
resultsFor the five datasets tested, DeepSelectNet's accuracy varied between [Formula: see text] 91 and 99% (average accuracy [Formula: see text] 95%). At its best performance, DeepSelectNet achieved a nearly 12% accuracy increase compared to its deep learning-based predecessor SquiggleNet. Furthermore, precision and recall evaluated for DeepSelectNet on average were always > 89% (average [Formula: see text] 95%). In terms of execution performance, DeepSelectNet outperformed SquiggleNet by [Formula: see text] 13% on average. Thus, DeepSelectNet is a practically viable method to improve the effectiveness of selective sequencing.
conclusionsCompared to base alignment and deep learning predecessors, DeepSelectNet can significantly improve the accuracy to enable real-time species classification using selective sequencing. The source code of DeepSelectNet is available at https://github.com/AnjanaSenanayake/DeepSelectNet .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.