Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36709246›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Trends in the utilization of medicines sold in the private sector post- registration in South Africa and the implications for similar countries.

Ntobeko Magnate Mpanza, Brian Godman, Mothobi Godfrey Keele, Moliehi Matlala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ntobeko Magnate MpanzaSchool of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa. ntobekobmw@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5050-4923
Brian GodmanSchool of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6539-6972
Mothobi Godfrey KeeleSchool of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7702-3727
Moliehi MatlalaSchool of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4887-4757

Funding

National Research Foundation,South Africa 138717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegulatory authorities register medicines for patients to access them within a reasonable period of time. There is a paucity of available data regarding the extent to which registered medicines reach the public after market authorisation is granted by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA). This is important since time spent by SAHPRA assessing medicines that are subsequently not launched onto the South African market means time wasted, which could be spent on assessing new medicines that address an unmet need in the country. Consequently, we initially analysed the time taken for registered medicines to reach patients and the relationship between medicines registered at SAHPRA and those subsequently dispensed in private pharmacies. The extent of registration of multiple sourced versus new patented medicines was also explored.

methodsA retrospective, descriptive and quantitative investigation was conducted for medicines registered between 2014 and 2019. Registered and dispensed medicines were compared to establish accessibility post registration. Data sources included SAHPRA and IQVIA datasets. Microsoft Excel and SAS were used for data storage, analysis, and computation of descriptive statistical analysis.

resultsOf (N = 2175) registered medicines, only 358 (16.5%; 95% CI 15.0%-18.1%) were dispensed to patients, and out of 1735 medicines registered between 2015 and 2019, only 57 (3.3%; 95% CI 2.5%-4.2%) were dispensed during the study period. Medicines acting on the central nervous system were registered and dispensed the most at 21.0% and 18.0%, respectively, whereas antineoplastic and immunomodulation agents were registered and dispensed only 11% and 5%, respectively. A concern was that only 13.0% of registered medicines were originators, with most either as generics, including branded generics, or pseudo-generics.

conclusionRegulatory measures should be implemented to ensure increased medicine access post-registration for new originators, especially for priority disease areas that benefit patients. Mental health diseases and improved access to oncology medicines require special attention and further investigation in South Africa.

Indexed as

PharmaciesPrivate SectorDrugs, GenericHealth Services AccessibilityHumansRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaDrugs, GenericDispensed medicinesMarketing authorisationMental HealthMultiple sourced medicinesPrivate sectorRetail pharmacySAHPRASingle Exit PriceSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID36709246
PMCPMC9884155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.