ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023
The Impact of a Limited Field-of-View on Computed Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Evaluating the Feasibility of Completing Ultrasound Segmentations with Parametric Geometries.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravascular ultrasound wall shear stress imaging in stented coronary arteries with ultrafast Doppler.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modeling Techniques and Boundary Conditions in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Analysis: Latest Developments in Simulation and Integration of Machine Learning and Data-Driven Approaches.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- On the feasibility of ultrasound Doppler-based personalized hemodynamic modeling of the abdominal aorta.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- Dynamic Coronary Blood Flow Velocity and Wall Shear Stress Estimation Using Ultrasound in an Ex Vivo Porcine Heart.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To improve abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk assessment, a large, longitudinal study on AAA hemodynamics and biomechanics is necessary, using personalized fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling. 3-dimensional, time-resolved ultrasound (3D+t US) is the preferred image modality to obtain the patient-specific AAA geometry for such a study, since it is safe, affordable and provides temporal information. However, the 3D+t US field-of-view (FOV) is limited and therefore often fails to capture the inlet and aorto-iliac bifurcation geometry. In this study, a framework was developed to add parametric inlet and bifurcation geometries to the abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry by employing dataset statistics and parameters of the AAA geometry. The impact of replacing the patient-specific inlet and bifurcation geometries, acquired using computed tomography (CT) scans, by parametric geometries was evaluated by examining the differences in hemodynamics (systolic and time-averaged wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index) in the aneurysm region. The results show that the inlet geometry has a larger effect on the AAA hemodynamics (median differences of 7.5 to 18.8%) than the bifurcation geometry (median differences all below 1%). Therefore, it is not feasible to replace the patient-specific inlet geometry by a generic one. Future studies should investigate the possibilities of extending the proximal FOV of 3D+t US. However, this study did show the feasibility of adding a parametric bifurcation geometry to the aneurysm geometry. After extending the proximal FOV, the obtained framework can be used to extract AAA geometries from 3D+t US for FSI simulations, despite the absence of the bifurcation geometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.