Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36709232›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023

The Impact of a Limited Field-of-View on Computed Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Evaluating the Feasibility of Completing Ultrasound Segmentations with Parametric Geometries.

Judith Fonken, Esther Maas, Arjet Nievergeld, Marc van Sambeek, Frans van de Vosse, Richard Lopata

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith FonkenPhotoacoustics & Ultrasound Laboratory Eindhoven (PULS/e), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. j.h.c.fonken@tue.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2578-318X
Esther MaasPhotoacoustics & Ultrasound Laboratory Eindhoven (PULS/e), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Arjet NievergeldPhotoacoustics & Ultrasound Laboratory Eindhoven (PULS/e), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Marc van SambeekPhotoacoustics & Ultrasound Laboratory Eindhoven (PULS/e), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Frans van de VosseCardiovascular Biomechanics, Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Richard LopataPhotoacoustics & Ultrasound Laboratory Eindhoven (PULS/e), Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 17533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture risk assessment, a large, longitudinal study on AAA hemodynamics and biomechanics is necessary, using personalized fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling. 3-dimensional, time-resolved ultrasound (3D+t US) is the preferred image modality to obtain the patient-specific AAA geometry for such a study, since it is safe, affordable and provides temporal information. However, the 3D+t US field-of-view (FOV) is limited and therefore often fails to capture the inlet and aorto-iliac bifurcation geometry. In this study, a framework was developed to add parametric inlet and bifurcation geometries to the abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry by employing dataset statistics and parameters of the AAA geometry. The impact of replacing the patient-specific inlet and bifurcation geometries, acquired using computed tomography (CT) scans, by parametric geometries was evaluated by examining the differences in hemodynamics (systolic and time-averaged wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index) in the aneurysm region. The results show that the inlet geometry has a larger effect on the AAA hemodynamics (median differences of 7.5 to 18.8%) than the bifurcation geometry (median differences all below 1%). Therefore, it is not feasible to replace the patient-specific inlet geometry by a generic one. Future studies should investigate the possibilities of extending the proximal FOV of 3D+t US. However, this study did show the feasibility of adding a parametric bifurcation geometry to the aneurysm geometry. After extending the proximal FOV, the obtained framework can be used to extract AAA geometries from 3D+t US for FSI simulations, despite the absence of the bifurcation geometry.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAorta, AbdominalFeasibility StudiesHemodynamicsHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, CardiovascularStress, MechanicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdominal aortic aneurysmComputational fluid dynamicsField-of-viewFluid–structure interactionHemodynamicsPersonalized modelingRupture risk assessmentUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36709232
PMCPMC10172266
OpenAlexW4318376807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.