Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36709219›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2023

Analysis of microbial keratitis incidence, isolates and in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility in the East of England: a 6-year study.

Malik Moledina, Harry W Roberts, Achyut Mukherjee, David Spokes, Dimitris Pimenides, Christopher Stephenson, Ramy Bassily, Madhavan S Rajan, James Myerscough

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbial keratitis in north-western Spain: a review of risk factors, microbiological profile and resistance patterns.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A comparison of antimicrobial regimen outcomes and antibiogram development in microbial keratitis: a prospective cohort study in Alexandria, Egypt.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  16. Increased tolerance to commonly used antibiotics in aMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Malik MoledinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Southend University Hospital, Southend, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3554-7797
Harry W RobertsWest of England Eye Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3590-0856
Achyut MukherjeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Colchester General Hospital, Colchester, UK.
David SpokesDepartment of Ophthalmology Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
Dimitris PimenidesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, UK.
Christopher StephensonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Hinchingbrooke, UK.
Ramy BassilyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK.
Madhavan S RajanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
James MyerscoughDepartment of Ophthalmology, Southend University Hospital, Southend, UK. james.myerscough1@nhs.net.
Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBBroomfield Hospital · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBColchester Hospital · GBHinchingbrooke Hospital · GBIpswich Hospital · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBRoyal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesTo report the incidence, microbiological profile and in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of microbial keratitis (MK) in the East of England (EoE) over a 6-year period. SUBJECTS/

methodsA retrospective study of patients diagnosed with MK who underwent corneal scraping at participating trusts, within the EoE, between 01/01/2015-01/07/2020. Analysis was performed on MK isolate profiles, in-vitro anti-microbial sensitivities and trends over time.

resultsThe mean incidence of IK, in the EoE, was estimated at 6.96 per 100 000 population/year. 1071 corneal scrapes were analysed, 460 were culture positive (42.95%) of which 87.2% were bacteria (50.3% gram-positive and 49.7% gram-negative), 2.4% polymicrobial, 9.3% fungi and 1.1% acanthamoeba. The most common organisms were pseudomonas spp (29.57%). There was a non-statistically significant trend (NST) in increasing incidence of pseudomonas spp, staph aureus and serratia (p = 0.719, p = 0.615, and p = 0.099 respectively) and a declining NST in Fungi (p = 0.058). Susceptibilities in-vitro to, penicillin classes, fluoroquinolone and aminoglycosides were 76.7% and 89.4%, 79.2% and 97.2% and 95.4 and 96.1% to gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria respectively. Gram-negative organisms were increasingly resistant to cephalosporins with a 19.2% reduction in sensitivity over time. (p = 0.011). Ceftriaxone showed the greatest decrease in sensitivity of 41.67% (p = 0.006).

conclusionIn the EoE, MK is relatively prevalent though likely underestimated. Profiles are similar to other UK regions with the exception of a higher fungal and lower acanthamoeba incidence. Common first and second-line antimicrobial selection provides, on the whole, good coverage. Nevertheless, anti-microbial resistance, to cephalosporins, was observed so selection should be carefully considered when treating MK empirically.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCorneal UlcerEye Infections, BacterialKeratitisAnti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsEnglandGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansIncidenceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID36709219
PMCPMC9883814
OpenAlexW4318334816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.