Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708931›Full record

ArticleUrology2023

Prosteria - National Trends and Outcomes of More Frequent Than Guideline Recommended Prostate Specific Antigen Screening.

Dylan J Peterson, Hriday P Bhambhvani, David R W Baird, Shufeng Li, Michael L Eisenberg, James D Brooks

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dylan J PetersonDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA. Electronic address: dylan.peterson@stanford.edu.
Hriday P BhambhvaniDepartment of Urology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
David R W BairdDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Shufeng LiDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Michael L EisenbergDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
James D BrooksDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Stanford University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize national trends in and associated outcomes of more often than annual prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, which we term "prosteria."

methodsMen in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart with ≥2 years from first PSA test to censoring at the end of insurance or available data (January 2003 to June 2019) or following exclusionary diagnoses or procedures, such as PCa treatment, were included. PSAs within 90 days were treated as one PSA. Prosteria was defined as having ≥3 PSA testing intervals of ≤270 days.

resultsA total of 9,734,077 PSAs on 2,958,923 men were included. The average inter-PSA testing interval was 1.5 years, and 4.5% of men had prosteria, which increased by 0.53% per year. Educated, wealthy, non-White patients were more likely to have prosteria. Men within the recommended screening age (ie 55-69) had lower rates of prosteria. Prosteria patients had higher average PSA values (2.5 vs 1.4 ng/mL), but lower values at PCa diagnosis. Prosteria was associated with biopsy and PCa diagnosis; however, there were comparable rates of treatment within 2 years of diagnosis.

conclusionIn this large cohort study, prosteria was common, increased over time, and was associated with demographic characteristics. Importantly, there were no clinically meaningful differences in PSA values at diagnosis or rates of early treatment, suggesting prosteria leads to both overdiagnosis and overtreatment. These results support current AUA and USPTF guidelines and can be used to counsel men seeking more frequent PSA screening.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMass ScreeningProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36708931
PMCPMC11315235
OpenAlexW4318052080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.