Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708788›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023

Early-Stage Primary Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Multi-Institution Experience.

Daniel E Oliver, Jose M Laborde, Deepinder P Singh, Michael T Milano, Gregory M Videtic, Graeme R Williams, Michael J LaRiviere, Jason W Chan, Gabrielle W Peters, Roy H Decker and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel E OliverDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Jose M LabordeBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Deepinder P SinghDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, New York.
Michael T MilanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, New York.
Gregory M VideticDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Graeme R WilliamsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael J LaRiviereDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jason W ChanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Gabrielle W PetersDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Roy H DeckerDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Pamela SamsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Clifford G RobinsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
William G BreenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Dawn OwenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sibo TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kristin A HigginsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Doaa AlmeldinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Salma K JabbourDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Fen WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
G Daniel GrassDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Bradford A PerezDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Thomas J DillingDepartments of Radiation Oncology.
Jonathan StrosbergDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Stephen A RosenbergDepartments of Radiation Oncology. Electronic address: Stephen.Rosenberg@moffitt.org.
Emory University · USMayo Clinic · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USWashington University in St. Louis · USYale University · USCleveland Clinic · USKlinik Rosenberg · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Dr. Salma Jabbour’s NCI Research Specialist (Clinician Scientist) Award (R50)R50CA275877 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Salma Jabbour · 2023 to 2026
$785k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS R50 CA275877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent guidelines recommend surgery as standard of care for primary lung neuroendocrine tumor (LNET). Given that LNET is a rare clinical entity, there is a lack of literature regarding treatment of LNET with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We hypothesized that SBRT could lead to effective locoregional tumor control and long-term outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed 48 tumors in 46 patients from 11 institutions with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of LNET, treated with primary radiation therapy. Data were collected for patients treated nonoperatively with primary radiation therapy between 2006 and 2020. Patient records were reviewed for lesion characteristics and clinical risk factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and Cox multivariate models were used to compare outcomes.

resultsMedian age at treatment was 71 years and mean tumor size was 2 cm. Thirty-two lesions were typical carcinoid histology, 7 were atypical, and 9 were indeterminate. The most common SBRT fractionation schedule was 50 to 60 Gy in 5 daily fractions. Overall survival at 3, 6, and 9 years was 64%, 43%, and 26%, respectively. Progression-free survival at 3, 6, and 9 years was 88%, 78%, and 78%, respectively. Local control at 3, 6, and 9 years was 97%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. There was 1 regional recurrence in a paraesophageal lymph node. No grade 3 or higher toxicity was identified.

conclusionsThis is the largest series evaluating outcomes in patients with LNET treated with SBRT. This treatment is well tolerated, provides excellent locoregional control, and should be offered as an alternative to surgical resection for patients with early-stage LNET, particularly those who may not be ideal surgical candidates.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, NeuroendocrineLung NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsRadiosurgeryHumansLungRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36708788
PMCPMC10845843
OpenAlexW4318051939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.