Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708787›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023

WNT Pathway Mutations in Metachronous Oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Philip Sutera, Matthew P Deek, Kim Van der Eecken, Amol C Shetty, Jin Hee Chang, Theresa Hodges, Yang Song, Sofie Verbeke, Jo Van Dorpe, Valérie Fonteyne and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of an artificial intelligence-based prognostic biomarker in patients with oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive prostate cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Philip SuteraDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Matthew P DeekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Kim Van der EeckenDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Amol C ShettyInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jin Hee ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Theresa HodgesInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yang SongInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sofie VerbekeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jo Van DorpeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Valérie FonteyneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Bram De LaereDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mark MishraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Zaker RanaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jason MolitorisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Matthew FerrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ashley RossDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Edward SchaefferDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Nicholas RobertsDepartment of Pathology, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel Y SongDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; James Buchanan Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Theodore DeWeeseDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; James Buchanan Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kenneth J PientaDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; James Buchanan Brady Urologic Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Emmanuel S AntonarakisDepartment of Medicine, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Piet OstDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium. Electronic address: piet.ost@ugent.be.
Phuoc T TranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: phuoc.tran@som.umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USJohns Hopkins University · USGhent University Hospital · BENorthwestern University · USGhent University · BEKarolinska Institutet · SERutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Resource Sharing CoreU54CA273956 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Phuoc T. Tran · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
Tumor-barcoding coupled with high-throughput sequencing of a novel chemoradiation resistant SCLC mouse modelU01CA231776 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HANN, CHRISTINE L., MARCHIONNI, LUIGI · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
Integrating bioinformatics into multiscale models for hepatocellular carcinomaU01CA212007 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EWALD, ANDREW JOSEF, FERTIG, ELANA · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA212007NCI NIH HHS U01 CA231776NCI NIH HHS U54 CA273956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWNT signaling is a cellular pathway that has been implicated in the development and progression of prostate cancer. Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) represents a unique state of disease in which metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival. Herein, we investigate the clinical implications of genomic alterations in the WNT signaling cascade in men with omCSPC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of 277 men with metachronous omCSPC who underwent targeted DNA sequencing of their primary/metastatic tumor. Patients were classified by presence or absence of pathogenic WNT pathway mutations (in the genes APC, RNF43, and CTNNB1). Pearson χ

resultsA pathogenic WNT pathway mutation was detected in 11.2% of patients. Patients with WNT pathway mutations were more likely to have visceral metastases (22.6% vs 2.8%; P < .01) and less likely to have regional lymph node metastases (29.0% vs 50.4%; P = .02). At time of oligometastasis, these patients were treated with MDT alone (33.9%), MDT + limited course of systemic therapy (20.6%), systemic therapy alone (22.4%), or observation (defined as no treatment for ≥6 months after metastatic diagnosis). Multivariable cox regression demonstrated WNT pathway mutations associated with significantly worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-12.00).

conclusionsSomatic WNT pathway alterations are present in approximately 11% of patients with omCSPC and are associated with an increased likelihood of visceral metastases. Although these patients have a worse natural history, they may benefit from MDT.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsWnt Signaling PathwayCastrationHumansMaleMutationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36708787
PMCPMC10443895
OpenAlexW4318197721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.