Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708716›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied biomedicine2022

Neuropsychological tests and prediction of dementia in association with the degree of carotid stenosis.

Ondrej Machaczka, David Skoloudik, Jana Janoutova, Martin Roubec, Eva Reiterova, Martina Kovalova, Anna Zatloukalova, Petr Ambroz, Vladimir Janout

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ondrej MachaczkaPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
David SkoloudikPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Jana JanoutovaPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Martin RoubecPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Eva ReiterovaPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Martina KovalovaPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Healthcare Management and Public Health, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Anna ZatloukalovaPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Petr AmbrozPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Vladimir JanoutPalacky University Olomouc, Faculty of Health Sciences, Science and Research Centre, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study constitutes a cross sectional analysis of the association between cognitive impairment defined by neuropsychological tests and carotid stenosis. The main objective was to compare the results of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) with regard to the degree of carotid stenosis. The sample comprised 744 patients who underwent a carotid duplex ultrasound and cognitive function testing (by ACE-R and MMSE). A multivariable analysis of potential confounding factors was completed. The significance of the different number of positive (MMSE ≤ 27, ACE-R ≤ 88) and negative (MMSE ≥ 28, ACE-R ≥ 89) results of the neuropsychological tests was analysed with regard to the degree of carotid stenosis (50-99%). Neuropsychological test results were also compared between carotid stenosis of 50-69%, 70-89%, and 90-99%. For both the MMSE and ACE-R, a difference was observed between positive and negative test results when higher degrees of stenosis were present. However, for the ACE-R only, more severe stenosis (80-89%, 90-99%) was predominantly associated with positive test results (p-value < 0.017). The same dependence for ACE-R (although not statistically significant) was observed in the group of patients without an ischemic stroke (confounding factor). In the case of the MMSE and more severe stenosis, negative results predominated, regardless of the confounding factor. There were no statistically significant differences in test results between carotid stenosis of 50-69%, 70-89%, and 90-99%. The results suggest that for assessing the early risk of cognitive impairment in patients with carotid atherosclerosis, the ACE-R appears more suitable than the MMSE.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisDementiaConstriction, PathologicCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNeuropsychological TestsAtherosclerosisCarotid stenosisCognitive impairmentNeuropsychological test

Identifiers

PMID36708716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.