Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708707›Full record

ArticleNeuron2023

Oxytocin receptor is not required for social attachment in prairie voles.

Kristen M Berendzen, Ruchira Sharma, Maricruz Alvarado Mandujano, Yichao Wei, Forrest D Rogers, Trenton C Simmons, Adele M H Seelke, Jessica M Bond, Rose Larios, Nastacia L Goodwin and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
29.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A vasopressin gate transforms social distress into caregiving.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Article
  3. But What Behavior?ArXiv · 2026
    Article
  4. A Demographic History of a Prairie Vole (Microtus ochrogaster) Breeding Colony (2004-2020).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A Demographic History of a Prairie Vole (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The prairie vole gut-brain-microbiota-axis: a narrative review.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. LinkedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. How does oxytocin modulate human behavior?Molecular psychiatry · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kristen M BerendzenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ruchira SharmaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Maricruz Alvarado MandujanoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Yichao WeiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Forrest D RogersDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Trenton C SimmonsDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Adele M H SeelkeDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Jessica M BondDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Rose LariosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 95158, USA.
Nastacia L GoodwinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael ShermanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Srinivas ParthasarthyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Isidero EspinedaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Joseph R KnoedlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Annaliese BeeryDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Karen L BalesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Nirao M ShahDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: nirao@stanford.edu.
Devanand S ManoliDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Integrative Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Kavli Institute for Fundamental Neuroscience, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: devanand.manoli@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Davis · USStanford University · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Gil Dan Rabinovici · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
TRAINING THE NEXT GENERATION OF MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCHERSR25MH060482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DANIEL H MATHALON, Susan M. Voglmaier · 2000 to 2026
$5.2M
Understanding the neural basis of social attachmentR01MH123513 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MANOLI, DEVANAND SADANAND · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
Molecular and Neural Networks Underlying Social AttachmentR01MH108319 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BALES, KAREN L., SHAH, NIRAO MAHESH · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Dissecting the neural control of social attachmentDP1MH099900 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHAH, NIRAO MAHESH · 2012 to 2013
$1.5M
Genetic models for social attachment deficits in psychiatric illnessK08MH107754 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MANOLI, DEVANAND SADANAND · 2016 to 2019
$737k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422NIMH NIH HHS DP1 MH099900NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH107754NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108319NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123513NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH060482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prairie voles are among a small group of mammals that display long-term social attachment between mating partners. Many pharmacological studies show that signaling via the oxytocin receptor (Oxtr) is critical for the display of social monogamy in these animals. We used CRISPR mutagenesis to generate three different Oxtr-null mutant prairie vole lines. Oxtr mutants displayed social attachment such that males and females showed a behavioral preference for their mating partners over a stranger of the opposite sex, even when assayed using different experimental setups. Mothers lacking Oxtr delivered viable pups, and parents displayed care for their young and raised them to the weanling stage. Together, our studies unexpectedly reveal that social attachment, parturition, and parental behavior can occur in the absence of Oxtr signaling in prairie voles.

Indexed as

GrasslandReceptors, OxytocinAnimalsArvicolinaeFemaleMaleMammalsOxytocinSocial BehaviorOxytocinReceptors, OxytocinCRISPRmonogamynursingoxytocin receptorpair-bondingparental behaviorpartner preferenceprairie volesocial attachment

Identifiers

PMID36708707
PMCPMC10150797
OpenAlexW4318225019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.