ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
The effect of previous induced abortion history on the assisted reproduction outcomes.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo study whether the history of induced abortion has an effect on the assisted reproduction outcomes in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET).
methods3045 patients who underwent IVF-ET in the Department of Human Reproductive Center of Renmin Hospital from January 2017 to June 2021. They were divided into two groups according to whether there was a history of induced abortion in the past, and the outcomes were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe clinical pregnancy rate in the group with induced abortion history was lower than that in the group without induced abortion history (63.1% vs 67.1%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.059). The spontaneous abortion rate in the group with induced abortion history was higher than that in the group without induced abortion history (14.9% vs 11.2%) (P = 0.044). The live birth rate in the group with induced abortion history was lower than that in the group without induced abortion history (52.8% vs 59.0%) (P = 0.006). Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that endometrial thickness (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.886 ~ 0.972, P = 0.002) and live birth rate (OR = 0.682, 95% CI = 0.495 ~ 0.939, P = 0.019) were negatively correlated with induced abortion history. The rate of spontaneous abortion (OR = 1.452, 95% CI = 1.042 ~ 2.024, P = 0.028) was positively correlated with the history of induced abortion.
conclusionsThe previous history of induced abortion is related to the outcomes of IVF /ICSI-ET, the endometrial thickness on HCG trigger day decreased, the risk of spontaneous abortion increased and the live birth rate decreased in patients with induced abortion history when undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.