ArticleESC heart failure2023
Intestinal permeability evaluation in patients with chronic Chagas heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut-Heart Axis: The Role of Gut Microbiota and Metabolites in Heart Failure.Circulation research · 2025Review
- Intestinal permeability evaluation in patients with chronic Chagas heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWe analysed intestinal permeability in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) and evaluated its association with clinical manifestations, haemodynamic parameters measured by echocardiogram, and disease outcome. Intestinal permeability was compared between CCC patients and a group of healthy controls.
backgroundIntestinal dysfunction may contribute to a more severe disease presentation with worse outcome in patients with CCC and heart failure.
methodsFifty patients with CCC and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 55% were prospectively selected and followed for a mean period of 18 ± 8 months. A group of 27 healthy volunteers were also investigated. One patient was excluded from the analysis since he died before completing the intestinal permeability test. Intestinal permeability was evaluated with the sugar probe drink test. It consists in the urinary recovery of previously ingested sugar probes: mannitol, a monosaccharide, and lactulose, a disaccharide.
resultsPatient's mean age was 53.4 ± 10.4 years, and 31(63%) were male. Differential urinary excretion of lactulose/mannitol ratio did not differ significantly between healthy controls and CCC patients, regardless of clinical signs of venous congestion, haemodynamic parameters, and severity of presentation and outcome.
conclusionsThe present study could not show a disturbance of the intestinal barrier in CCC patients with LVEF <55%, measured by lactulose/mannitol urinary excretion ratio. Further investigations are needed to verify if in patients with LVEF <40% intestinal permeability is increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.