Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708125›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2023

[Research progress on rodent models of cervical spinal cord injury].

Hao Chen, Xin Rong, Kangkang Huang, Hao Liu

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Xin RongDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Kangkang HuangDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.
Hao LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610041, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To summarize the research progress on rodent models of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: The relevant domestic and foreign literature in recent years was reviewed, the methods of establishing the rodent models of cervical SCI and the evaluation methods of behavior, imaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and histology were summarized. Results: Cervical SCI involves primary and secondary injuries. Primary cervical SCI can be simulated with contusion, contusion compression, fracture dislocation, spinal cord traction, and spinal cord transection; scondary cervical SCI can be simulated with photochemical model and excitotoxicity model. Certain evaluation methods such as behavior, imaging, neuroelectrophysiology, and histology are used to evaluation during model building and research. Conclusion: Different rodent models of cervical SCI have different advantages and application directions, and it is critical importance for the study of cervical SCI to establish effective animal models.

Indexed as

Cervical CordContusionsSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalRodentiaSpinal Cordanimal modelCervical spine cord injurymodel evaluationrodent

Identifiers

PMID36708125
PMCPMC9883646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.