Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708116›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2023

[Comparison of mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with three-dimensional microscope in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis].

Yang Yu, Yongtao Wang, Yizhou Xie, Jiajia Xu, Yuzhou Chen, Xiaohong Fan

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Effectiveness analysis of posterolateral approach lumbar interbody fusion assisted by one-hole split endoscope for LZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yang YuDepartment of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China.
Yongtao WangDepartment of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China.
Yizhou XieDepartment of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China.
Jiajia XuDepartment of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China.
Yuzhou ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China.
Xiaohong FanDepartment of Orthopedics, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu Sichuan, 610072, P. R. China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese · CNCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare the mid-term effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) assisted with three-dimensional microscope in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods: A total of 41 single level lumbar spondylolisthesis patients who met the selection criteria were retrospectively collected between June 2018 and September 2019. Twenty-three patients were treated with UBE-TLIF (study group) and 18 with MIS-TLIF assisted with three-dimensional microscope (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, Meyerding degree of slippage, type of spondylolisthesis, lesion segment, course of disease, and preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar lordosis (LL), and disc height (DH) between the two groups ( Results: All the operations were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups ( Conclusion: Both UBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF assisted with three-dimensional microscope have the advantages of clear intraoperative field and high surgical efficiency in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis, and can obtain satisfactory mid-term effectiveness. Compared with MIS-TLIF assisted with three-dimensional microscope, UBE-TLIF has the advantages of less bleeding and faster recovery.

Indexed as

LordosisSpinal FusionSpondylolisthesisBlood Loss, SurgicalEndoscopyHematomaHumansLumbar VertebraeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomemicroscopetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusionUnilateral biportal endoscopy technology

Identifiers

PMID36708116
PMCPMC9883650
OpenAlexW4318391147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.