Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708091›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical virology2023

Transmission of monkeypox/mpox virus: A narrative review of environmental, viral, host, and population factors in relation to the 2022 international outbreak.

Daniel Pan, Joshua Nazareth, Shirley Sze, Christopher A Martin, Jonathan Decker, Eve Fletcher, T Déirdre Hollingsworth, Michael R Barer, Manish Pareek, Julian W Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical virology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Mpox and the one health approach.Dialogues in health · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel PanDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1268-2243
Joshua NazarethDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Shirley SzeDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Christopher A MartinDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Jonathan DeckerDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Eve FletcherDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
T Déirdre HollingsworthLi Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael R BarerDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Manish PareekDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Julian W TangDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR302338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monkeypox virus (MPXV) has spread globally. Emerging studies have now provided evidence regarding MPXV transmission, that can inform rational evidence-based policies and reduce misinformation on this topic. We aimed to review the evidence on transmission of the virus. Real-world studies have isolated viable viruses from high-touch surfaces for as long as 15 days. Strong evidence suggests that the current circulating monkeypox (mpox) has evolved from previous outbreaks outside of Africa, but it is yet unknown whether these mutations may lead to an inherently increased infectivity of the virus. Strong evidence also suggests that the main route of current MPXV transmission is sexual; through either close contact or directly, with detection of culturable virus in saliva, nasopharynx, and sperm for prolonged periods and the presence of rashes mainly in genital areas. The milder clinical presentations and the potential presence of presymptomatic transmission in the current circulating variant compared to previous clades, as well as the dominance of spread amongst men who have sex with men (MSMs) suggests that mpox has a developed distinct clinical phenotype that has increased its transmissibility. Increased public awareness of MPXV transmission modalities may lead to earlier detection of the spillover of new cases into other groups.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxSexual and Gender MinoritiesDisease OutbreaksHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMonkeypox virusSemenmonkeypoxmpoxsexual contacttransmissionviral load

Identifiers

PMID36708091
PMCPMC10107822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.