Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36708003›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

The adapted Activity-By-Contact model for enhancer-gene assignment and its application to single-cell data.

Dennis Hecker, Fatemeh Behjati Ardakani, Alexander Karollus, Julien Gagneur, Marcel H Schulz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. EpiATLAS - a reference for human epigenomic research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Probing transcription factor subsets in gene regulatory networks.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis HeckerInstitute of Cardiovascular Regeneration, Goethe University Hospital.ORCID 0000-0003-0272-243X
Fatemeh Behjati ArdakaniInstitute of Cardiovascular Regeneration, Goethe University Hospital.
Alexander KarollusSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching 85748.
Julien GagneurSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching 85748.ORCID 0000-0002-8924-8365
Marcel H SchulzInstitute of Cardiovascular Regeneration, Goethe University Hospital.ORCID 0000-0002-1252-3656
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Cardio-Pulmonary InstituteGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research 81Z0200101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIdentifying regulatory regions in the genome is of great interest for understanding the epigenomic landscape in cells. One fundamental challenge in this context is to find the target genes whose expression is affected by the regulatory regions. A recent successful method is the Activity-By-Contact (ABC) model which scores enhancer-gene interactions based on enhancer activity and the contact frequency of an enhancer to its target gene. However, it describes regulatory interactions entirely from a gene's perspective, and does not account for all the candidate target genes of an enhancer. In addition, the ABC model requires two types of assays to measure enhancer activity, which limits the applicability. Moreover, there is neither implementation available that could allow for an integration with transcription factor (TF) binding information nor an efficient analysis of single-cell data.

resultsWe demonstrate that the ABC score can yield a higher accuracy by adapting the enhancer activity according to the number of contacts the enhancer has to its candidate target genes and also by considering all annotated transcription start sites of a gene. Further, we show that the model is comparably accurate with only one assay to measure enhancer activity. We combined our generalized ABC model with TF binding information and illustrated an analysis of a single-cell ATAC-seq dataset of the human heart, where we were able to characterize cell type-specific regulatory interactions and predict gene expression based on TF affinities. All executed processing steps are incorporated into our new computational pipeline STARE. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at https://github.com/schulzlab/STARE. CONTACT: marcel.schulz@em.uni-frankfurt.de. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationTranscription FactorsHumansProtein BindingRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSoftwareTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID36708003
PMCPMC9931646
OpenAlexW4318393690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.