Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36707996›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2023

The pattern of MHC class I expression in muscle biopsies from patients with myositis and other neuromuscular disorders.

José C Milisenda, Iago Pinal-Fernandez, Thomas E Lloyd, Josep Maria Grau-Junyent, Lisa Christopher-Stine, Andrea M Corse, Andrew L Mammen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

José C MilisendaMuscle Research Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universidad de Barcelona and CIBERER, Barcelona, Spain.
Iago Pinal-FernandezMuscle Disease Unit, Laboratory of Muscle Stem Cells and Gene Regulations, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Thomas E LloydDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Josep Maria Grau-JunyentMuscle Research Unit, Internal Medicine Service, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universidad de Barcelona and CIBERER, Barcelona, Spain.
Lisa Christopher-StineDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrea M CorseDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andrew L MammenMuscle Disease Unit, Laboratory of Muscle Stem Cells and Gene Regulations, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases · USHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiagnostic muscle biopsies are routinely immunostained for major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) protein. In this study we analysed the prevalence and patterns of MHC-I immunostaining in biopsies from patients with different types of myopathies and neurogenic disorders.

methodsAll 357 diagnostic muscle biopsies processed at the Johns Hopkins Neuromuscular Pathology Laboratory from August 2013 to January 2017 were immunostained for MHC-I. The prevalence and patterns of MHC-I immunostaining were compared between patients with histologically normal muscle biopsies (n = 31), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs; n = 170), non-inflammatory myopathies (n = 60) and neurogenic disorders (n = 96).

resultsMHC-I immunostaining was abnormal in most patients with DM (98%), sporadic IBM (sIBM; 100%), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM; 100%) and polymyositis (77%). In contrast, MHC-I immunostaining was less frequently present in non-inflammatory myopathies (32%) or neurogenic disorders (30%). Overall, abnormal MHC-I immunostaining had a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 0.82 for diagnosing IIMs. A focal MHC-I staining pattern was associated with IMNM, whereas a global pattern was more prevalent in sIBM and a perifascicular pattern was significantly more common in dermatomyositis. Among 18 DM biopsies without perifascicular atrophy, 50% had a perifascicular MHC-I staining pattern. Sarcoplasmic upregulation staining was more common than sarcolemmal staining across all groups.

conclusionMHC-I immunostaining was useful to distinguish IIMs from non-inflammatory myopathies or neurogenic disorders. Of note, a perifascicular MHC-I staining pattern was present only in those with DM, including half of those without perifascicular atrophy; many of these biopsies may not otherwise have been diagnostic for DM.

Indexed as

Muscular DiseasesMyositisAtrophyBiopsyHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansMusclesMuscle, SkeletalHistocompatibility Antigens Class IdermatomyositisIBMimmune-mediated necrotizing myositismajor histocompatibility complex class Imuscle biopsymyositisPM

Identifiers

PMID36707996
PMCPMC10473215
OpenAlexW4318392804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.